Melbourne-rail-transport-stub is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport
Different image put back in
Because (apparently) the Metlink logo is not allowed, I've put my X'Trap icon in this - needs to have some sort of icon. If anyone has a better image somewhere, feel free to use that. --Evan C (Talk) 04:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hang on, why can't the Metlink logo be used? Doesn't it come under fair use as a logo for a corporation? I personally think the Metlink logo is more apporiate for the stations than the picture of the Xtraopolis train (even though I love it when one pulls up at the station!) simply because Metlink is the network in which the stations lie on. Lakeyboy10:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, apparently it's not fair use - just going by what Ed g2s has said. Anyhood - Metlink isn't the rail network anyway, no more than Connex, that is. Metlink is the umbrella organisation for all of Melbourne's PT.
Do we need a seperate Melbourne and Victoria stub?