Template talk:Islam-bio-stub

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Stub sorting This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Biography This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation. Islam This template is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

notable

There's a word notable on this stub, that I think is unnecessary, because it goes without saying that all wikipedia articles should be notable. How 'bout removing it?Feureau 15:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Unlink request

{{editprotected}} Please remove the link to 'biography' (which is just an ordinary dictionary word, per WP:OVERLINK), and 'Islam', which will be repeating a link in any article in which this template appears. Colonies Chris (talk) 17:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because there are several similar requests open, I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stub sorting#Possible overlinking in bio stubs. If there is consensus there for the changes (or at least no objections), then they can all be done together. --RL0919 (talk) 16:45, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Partly done: Per the discussion, I have unlinked the word 'biographical'. If a consensus develops for removing other links, please submit a new edit request with a link to the relevant discussion. --RL0919 (talk) 20:15, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]