This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
Removing links
I noticed that this album infobox seems to be the only one to have some parameters be linked, compared to the person infobox, film infobox, TV infobox, or even something like ship career infobox. The links are:
Looking at the article Nirvana (band), the above links never appear in the article body, so I wonder if the linked parameters are vestigial and a little unnecessary if they aren't used in articles. I would like to suggest that we do not need to have these links for the parameters since they are instances of too much generalistic linking. The other infoboxes do not have such links for their parameters. Any objection to removal? Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me)21:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I think they're all valid and could be informative to readers. If the text is going to appear anyway, why not give a link to what exactly a record producer is? I think a lot of us don't have very good personal definitions of a term like that. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯22:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Re: the Ed Sheeran albums named for math symbols (+, ×, ÷, =, and −), the article titles are not auto-italicizing. Some technical limitation, perhaps? Just thought I should bring it to your attention. — TARDIS builder✉ ★ 20:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the first example, I see (among a lot of other code) when I look at the source:
Okay, hard to argue with the code being there, but the titles just very much do not appear italicized when I compare them visually to the album titles as italicized in the first word of the first paragraph. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ — TARDIS builder✉ ★ 10:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only reason Multiply's title looks slanty is because it's actually a lowercase X. That article's name is contentious, and there has been discussion about renaming it multiple times over the years, according to the history. I only discovered that because I thought it was weird that that was the only title out of the 5 I highlighted that was italicizing properly. — TARDIS builder✉ ★ 16:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remove all content and leave just {{Italic title}} and preview the page. Open another tab and remove all content and preview the page. You will see the very small difference. It's probably a font issue. Gonnym (talk) 18:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a tricky thing about infoboxes: they can really spiral out of control quickly (e.g. look at most cricket players that have wildly detailed statistics). If we include the cover artist, what about conductors, arrangers, engineers, mixers, masterers? Slippery slope arguments are generally weak, so I won't rely just on that, but rest assured that lots of pretty tertiary parameters would be added. Ultimately, I think that if you're looking for an overview of the most basic facts about an album, the cover artist is rarely one of them and is something that would be covered in the text of the article. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯00:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The cover artist is probably the most missed parameter, see "search archive" on top. It is equal to that of the director and also groundbreaking for an era. Lettres (talk) 13:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
In the chronology header parameter, header13, please replace {{#invoke:String2 | ucfirst |{{{artist|}}}}} with {{{artist|}}} as none of the other instances of the artist name being displayed force an uppercase letter, causing artists with lower-case initial letters such as t.A.T.u. to be rendered correctly in all of the template except in the chronology header. UltrasonicMadness (talk) 11:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Chronology parameter not properly capitalizing first letter of artist name
The documentation states that when the |chronology= parameter is left blank, the first letter of the artist name is automatically capitalized in the chronology header, so that artists whose names start with the word "the" have proper capitalization throughout the infobox. However, this does not appear to be working properly. I've added the parameter with no value, and in my edit preview, I still see the chronology header using the exact same value as the |artist= parameter, without the first letter being capitalized. Does anyone know why this is occurring? Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 17:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I missed that - I was sure I had a good look through the documentation and the source code before requesting that edit. I will be more thorough about this in the future. UltrasonicMadness (talk) 16:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This 2020 discussion yielded a consensus to "use a single chronology encompassing all album types" (my emphasis). It allowed for an exception in the case of collaborative albums, where "a single chronology is applied for each [of the] artists involved".
Separate chronologies are also sometime used for releases from decades ago, when they were different across markets (see Sgt. Pepper). I do not see any reason to change from that way of doing it. Tkbrett (✉)19:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't we make promotional singles section?
Not only singles from the album, but also promotional singles too! for example, "Promotional singles from (album name)" and 1. 2. 3. •• etc. How's y'all think?
_-_The_Noun_Project.svg){kind=small}
