Template:Infobox NRHP is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
This template was considered for deletion on 2019 March 13. The result of the discussion was "keep".
Template improvement request for automatic categories with individually listed contributing properties
With individually listed contributing property articles, the automatic categories from this template are not ideal per this conversation:
What I suggest should happen
Placing nrhp_type2 = indcp in the infobox would automatically add the state level "Category:Individually listed contributing properties to historic districts on the National Register in Foo"
This would match how "cp" automatically adds the article to the correct contributing property category by state
Templates, and infoboxes in particular, should not really be adding cats other than maintenance categories to articles. I'm honestly not really sure why this template seems to have escaped this. The best option here will be to add in the categories to their relevant articles, which will allow for more appropriate cleanup as necessary. Primefac (talk) 20:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If someone could go through and figure out what values trigger what cats (I don't really have time at the moment, but I'll see if I can manage if not) I can file a bot request to add the right cats to the pages directly so we can disable the template-provided cats. I do know based on the OP's comment that some will be incorrect, but it's a lot easier to fix when the cats are directly on the page. Primefac (talk) 14:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just curious what the proper way to use the infobox for a relisted building; in this case, Weyerhaeuser Office Building was relisted in 2024 after it was renovated. I think a parameter similar to increasenum but for the relisted reference number, or a custom label that can override the "(increase)" note would be the best way forward. SounderBruce07:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How common is relisting? If there are just half a dozen sites, an embedded template using |module= is probably the way to go rather than building out more infrastructure within the template. I haven't tested it, but it should work. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
