Template talk:Famine in India

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disaster management This template is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. India This template is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.

Backdoor deletion

Backdoor deletion by redirecting it is not ok. That is against Wiki rules. AFD can be used instead. Crashed greek (talk) 12:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted too Crashed greek. The portrayal of these famines in drama belongs in this template and there isn't a suitable reason to remove Deccan famine of 1630–1632. LearnIndology (talk) 16:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both the initial edits and the revert seem in good faith, just differing template-arrangement concepts. In my experience templates usually contain media about a topic if available, either in a few entries if there aren't too many or in overall links such as Statue of Liberty in popular culture while also linking prominent examples. I don't know if this is a part of a guideline or not, but makes sense so readers interested in the principal topic can learn more about how it has impacted overall society. Randy Kryn (talk) 21:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the same way Randy Kryn, which is why I restored the Media section. Nice to see you here, LearnIndology (talk) 04:17, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]