This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Not really; about half of the stuff here wasn't part of the Atlantic campaign, and a lot of stuff that was isn't here. I came here to offer to fix it, but if you are planning to do it, that's OK. Xyl 54 (talk) 04:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone have any thoughts about the scope of this template? Would anyone else see the Atlantic campaign as being different to the Battle of the Atlantic?
The phrase was Churchill's, and he was referring specifically to the assault on Britain’s supply line (ie the north Atlantic route, and the route from Gibraltar and West Africa/Freetown).
His phrase probably wouldn’t include the operations against the Vichy fleet or Dakar, or Operation Torch, or the USN’s mid-Atlantic route to the Mediterranean theatre; and it wouldn’t include the invasion of Norway or the Axis efforts to run the Allied blockade. All of those would be part of an "Atlantic campaign", and the BotA would be another part (albeit a pretty big part) also.
Any thoughts? Xyl 54 (talk) 23:13, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps the name is wrong and it should be something like "World War II in the Atlantic" rather than make a campaign out of a lot of less related things that happened?GraemeLeggett (talk) 07:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]