Review of Civil Litigation CostsThe Review of Civil Litigation Costs, or Jackson Review or Jackson Proposals, is a review of civil litigation costs in England and Wales conducted by Lord Justice Jackson in 2009. The review's final report, known as the Jackson Report, was presented in January 2010.[1] HistoryThe senior judiciary were concerned about the cost of civil justice in England and Wales, in particular because the costs were often disproportionate to the issues, and in late 2008 the Master of the Rolls, Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony, asked Lord Justice Jackson to conduct a review into civil litigation costs.[2]: 1 The review became known as the Jackson Review. It commenced in January 2009 and took about a year to complete, a preliminary report being published on 8 May 2009. On 14 January 2010, Jackson published the final report to the new Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger.[3] AssessorsJackson was assisted in his work by a panel of assessors, comprising:[2] : 2
FindingsThe final report is 557 pages long.[1] The main findings and recommendations include:[1]
Follow-upAfter the Jackson Report was published, the Judicial Executive Board agreed to support the recommendations of the final report and established a Judicial Steering Group with the following members:[3]
ImplementationReforms to civil costs were implemented in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, which came into effect on 1 April 2013. Part 2 of the Act covered the implementation of recommendations 7, 9, 14 and 94 of the final report. Recommendations 10 and 65(i), concerned with a 10% general increase in damages in most tort cases, was made known in an Appeal Court ruling, in the case of Christopher Simmons v Derek Castle, and also took effect from 1 April 2013.[5] References
External links |