For most fluids observable on Earth, traditional fluid mechanics based on Newtonian mechanics is sufficient. However, as the fluid velocity approaches the speed of light or moves through strong gravitational fields, or the pressure approaches the energy density (), these equations are no longer valid.[2] Such situations occur frequently in astrophysical applications. For example, gamma-ray bursts often feature speeds only less than the speed of light,[3] and neutron stars feature gravitational fields that are more than times stronger than the Earth's.[4] Under these extreme circumstances, only a relativistic treatment of fluids will suffice.
These equations reduce to the classical Euler equations if the fluid three-velocity is much less than the speed of light, the pressure is much less than the energy density, and the latter is dominated by the rest mass density. To close this system, an equation of state, such as an ideal gas or a Fermi gas, is also added.[1]
Equations of Motion in Flat Space
In the case of flat space, that is and using a metric signature of , the equations of motion are,[6]
Where is the energy density of the system, with being the pressure, and being the four-velocity of the system.
Expanding out the sums and equations, we have, (using as the material derivative)
Then, picking to observe the behavior of the velocity itself, we see that the equations of motion become
Note that taking the non-relativistic limit, we have . This says that the energy of the fluid is dominated by its rest energy.
In this limit, we have and , and can see that we return the Euler Equation of .
Derivation of the Equations of Motion
In order to determine the equations of motion, we take advantage of the following spatial projection tensor condition:
We prove this by looking at and then multiplying each side by . Upon doing this, and noting that , we have . Relabeling the indices as shows that the two completely cancel. This cancellation is the expected result of contracting a temporal tensor with a spatial tensor.
Now, when we note that
where we have implicitly defined that , we can calculate that
and thus
Then, let's note the fact that and . Note that the second identity follows from the first. Under these simplifications, we find that
^ abThorne, Kip S.; Blandford, Roger D. (2017). Modern Classical Physics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. pp. 719–720. ISBN9780691159027.
^An introduction to the sun and stars. Green, S. F., Jones, Mark H. (Mark Henry), Burnell, S. Jocelyn. (Co-published ed.). Cambridge: Open University. 2004. ISBN0-521-83737-5. OCLC54663723.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)