During the 1920s, the horrors of World War I were foremost in the thoughts of many social scientists. Soon after his arrival at Chicago, Wright organized an ongoing interdisciplinary study of wars, which eventually resulted in over 40 dissertations and 10 books. Wright summarized this research in his magnum opus A Study of War (1942).
War, to be abolished, must be understood. To be understood, it must be studied. No one man worked with more sustained care, compassion, and level-headedness on the study of war, its causes, and its possible prevention than Quincy Wright. He did so for nearly half a century, not only as a defender of man's survival, but as a scientist. He valued accuracy, facts, and truth more than any more appealing or preferred conclusions; and in his great book, A Study of War, he gathered, together with his collaborators, a larger body of relevant facts, insights, and far-ranging questions about war than anyone else has done.
Wright's study of warfare inspired many social scientists and his database of wars is an indispensable resource for anyone seriously interested in quantitative studies of human conflicts.
Other than A Study of War, Wright published a further 20 books and nearly 400 journal articles during his career. Several of his books became standard texts, including Mandates Under the League of Nations (1930) and The Study of International Relations (1955). In The Study of International Relations, Wright distinguished between eight root disciplines of international relations: "international law, diplomatic history, military science, international politics, international organization, international trade, colonial government, and the conduct of foreign relations."[13] These disciplines were supplemented by the following specialties: "world history, world geography, pacifism, the psychology and sociology of international relations; humanistic, social, and biological disciplines; and the recent development of regional studies, operational research, and group dynamics."[13] In a review of the book, Harold Lasswell wrote that Wright sought to provide a common frame for the study of world politics and to halt an emerging trend towards increased specialization.[13]
Wright was a prominent legal expert on the mandates system.[14] While conducting research for Mandates Under the League of Nations (1930), which was funded by a Guggenheim Foundation grant,[15] Wright visited Damascus less than two weeks after it had been shelled during the Great Syrian Revolt.[14] His experiences in Damascus shaped his views on the mandates system and colonialism. Wright rebutted notions that Syrians were barbarians who could not govern themselves. He argued that the Syrian rebels were a state in the making and that French actions to repress the Syrians were a "policy of terrorism" and war crimes.[14] Wright rebutted notions that Syrians were not protected by international law.[16]
Selected publications
The Control of American Foreign Relations. 1922. Macmillan.[17]
"Dr. Quincy Wright, 79, Is Dead; Authority on International Law; Proponent of Understanding". New York Times. October 18, 1970.
Falk, Richard A. (July 1972). "Quincy Wright: On Legal Tests of Aggressive War". American Journal of International Law. 66 (3): 560–571. doi:10.2307/2198728. JSTOR2198728. S2CID147443852.
Gorman, Daniel (April 2017). "International Law and the International Thought of Quincy Wright, 1918–1945". Diplomatic History. 41 (2): 336–361. doi:10.1093/dh/dhw052.
Lepawsky, Albert, Edward H. Buehrig & Harold D. Lasswell (eds.) (1971), The search for world order: Studies by students and colleagues of Quincy Wright. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. ISBN0-3905-5513-4