Foreign policy school of thought
Progressive realism is a foreign policy paradigm largely made popular by Robert Wright in 2006[ 1] which focuses on producing measurable results in pursuit of widely supported goals.[ 2] It supports stronger international institutions, free trade, and national interests.[ 2] The UK Foreign Secretary, David Lammy , suggested that Progressive Realism will underpin his foreign policy in a speech to the Fabian Society . [ 3]
Progressive realists' beliefs stand in stark contrast to those of neoconservatives . Unlike neoconservatives, progressive realists assert that international security and economic interdependence enable international governance to advance national interests.[ 4] [ 5] They highlight the importance of strong participation in the United Nations and acquiescence to international law .[ 4] The policy emphasizes the need to convert "hard" power and "soft" power into "smart" power .[ 6]
References
^ Hynd, Steve (June 23, 2009). "Progressive Realism And Iran" . Archived from the original on July 17, 2011. Retrieved January 10, 2010 .
^ a b Greg Anrig (July 20, 2006). "Why democrats should pursue "progressive realism" at home" . Archived from the original on July 5, 2009. Retrieved December 17, 2010 .
^ Lammy, David (1 February 2024). "Progressive Realism" . Fabian Society .
^ a b Wright, Robert (December 31, 1969). " 'Progressive realism': In search of a foreign policy - Editorials & Commentary - International Herald Tribune" . The New York Times . Retrieved January 10, 2011 .
^ Nye, Joseph (August 21, 2006). "Progressive Realism" . Retrieved January 10, 2011 .
^ Nye, Joseph (August 31, 2006). "Progressive realism in foreign policy" . Retrieved January 13, 2011 .
Africa
Central East North Southern West
Americas
Caribbean Central Northern South
Asia
Central East South Southeast Western
Europe
Eastern Northern Southern Western
Oceania
Australasia Melanesia Micronesia Polynesia
Former states