Patient experience

Patient experience describes the range of interactions that patients have with the healthcare system, including care from health plans, doctors, nurses, and staff in hospitals, physician practices, and other healthcare facilities.[1][2] Understanding patient experience is a key step in moving toward patient-centered care.[3][4] Evaluating patient experience provides a complete picture of healthcare quality. It reflects whether patients are receiving care that is respectful of and responsive to their preferences, needs, and values.

Key Aspects

Patient experience can be categorized into eight key aspects:[5]

These aspects collectively contribute to a patient-centered approach, emphasizing the importance of responsiveness and respect in healthcare delivery.

Patient experience vs. patient satisfaction

The terms patient experience and patient satisfaction are often used interchangeably but have distinct meanings:[6]

  • Patient experience focuses on whether specific processes or events in a patient's care journey met established standards. It asks objective questions such as whether a provider explained medical conditions clearly or whether the patient was involved in decision-making.
  • Patient satisfaction is a subjective measure reflecting a patient’s perception of their care. It can be influenced by individual expectations, personal attitudes, or external factors. Two patients receiving identical care may report different satisfaction levels based on their differing expectations.

Patient experience is often reported in health research as also encompassing people's experiences of illness and injury outside of their experiences with health services, such as those experiences with family and friends, the influence of illness/injury over their capacity to engage in social activities or previously imagined futures,[7] and even their engagement with the development of the guidelines that will inform their treatment.[8] For example, researchers might report of the patient experience of living with heart failure[9] or other chronic illnesses.[10]

Measurement

Patient Experience Metrics
Using a combination of objective and subjective interactions, perceptions, affect, and outcome metrics helps capture the complex and dynamic nature of patient experience.

Patient experience has become a key quality outcome for healthcare; measuring it is seen to support improvement in healthcare quality, governance, public accountability and patient choice.[11] Measures of patient experience arose from work in the 1980s and is now there use is now widescale. However, their effectiveness has been questioned[12] and clinicians and managers may disagree about their use.[13] There is a general agreement in the literature that measuring patient experience can be accomplished using a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods approach.

Effective measurement of patient experience is essential for improving healthcare quality. Key methods include:

CAHPS Surveys

CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) surveys are critical tools for assessing patient-centered care.[14] These standardized instruments ask patients about their experiences, such as communication with providers, staff responsiveness, and ease of accessing information. CAHPS surveys do not measure satisfaction but focus on reporting patient experiences to ensure consistency and reliability across healthcare systems.

Other Surveys

Other tools, such as the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire and NHS Patient Surveys, gather standardized feedback on aspects like cleanliness, courtesy, and timeliness.[15] Surveys provide large datasets for benchmarking and comparative analysis but are limited by memory bias and predefined topics.

Patient Interviews

Interviews provide qualitative insights, uncovering emotional and interpersonal factors influencing patient perceptions. They are valuable for exploring sensitive issues, though they require significant time and resources.

Focus Groups

These sessions bring together patients with shared experiences to explore common themes.[16] They are effective for testing new healthcare initiatives but require skilled facilitation to ensure all voices are heard.

Experience Sampling

This method captures real-time data on patients’ emotions and reactions during their care journey, reducing recall bias.[17] Mobile apps and text prompts facilitate this approach, though frequent prompts may feel intrusive.

Psychophysiological Techniques

Tools such as heart rate variability monitoring, facial expression analysis, and eye-tracking provide objective data on stress, comfort, and engagement. Though resource-intensive, these techniques offer unique insights into patient experiences.[18]

Sentiment Analysis

Using natural language processing (NLP), this method analyzes patient reviews and open-ended feedback to identify trends and priorities for improvement. It is particularly valuable for capturing insights from patients who do not participate in traditional surveys.

Experimental Design

By testing specific interventions (e.g., empathy training for staff), experimental designs evaluate the impact of targeted strategies on patient experience. This approach supports evidence-based decision-making but requires careful planning and ethical considerations.

By utilizing a combination of objective and subjective interactions, perceptions, affect, and outcome metrics, healthcare providers can effectively capture the complex and dynamic nature of patient experience.[1] This multifaceted approach leverages the strengths of various measurement methods, resulting in more comprehensive insights and enabling targeted improvements in patient-centered care.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Godovykh, Maksim; Pizam, Abraham (2023-07-01). "Measuring patient experience in healthcare". International Journal of Hospitality Management. Hospitality in Healthcare. 112: 103405. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103405. ISSN 0278-4319.
  2. ^ "Home". The Beryl Institute. Retrieved 2024-12-15.
  3. ^ Ahmed F, Burt J, Rowland M: Measuring patient experience: concepts and methods. In The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0060-5.
  4. ^ Mirzaei, M., Aspin, C., Essue, B., Jeon, Y. H., Dugdale, P., Usherwood, T., & Leeder, S. (2013). A patient-centred approach to health service delivery: improving health outcomes for people with chronic illness. BMC health services research, 13(1), 251.
  5. ^ "What Is Patient Experience?". www.ahrq.gov. Retrieved 2024-12-15.
  6. ^ Friedel, Anna Lena; Siegel, Sonja; Kirstein, Cedric Fabian; Gerigk, Monja; Bingel, Ulrike; Diehl, Anke; Steidle, Oliver; Haupeltshofer, Steffen; Andermahr, Bernhard; Chmielewski, Witold; Kreitschmann-Andermahr, Ilonka (2023-03-08). "Measuring Patient Experience and Patient Satisfaction—How Are We Doing It and Why Does It Matter? A Comparison of European and U.S. American Approaches". Healthcare. 11 (6): 797. doi:10.3390/healthcare11060797. ISSN 2227-9032. PMC 10048416. PMID 36981454.
  7. ^ Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of health & illness, 4(2), 167-182.
  8. ^ Khodyakov, Dmitry; Denger, Brian; Sean Grant DPhil; Armstrong, Courtney; Ann Martin; Peay, Holly; Coulter, Ian; Hazlewood, Glen (2019). "The RAND/PPMD Patient-Centeredness Method: a novel online approach to engaging patients and their representatives in guideline development". European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare. 7 (3): 470–475. doi:10.5750/ejpch.v7i3.1750 (inactive 1 November 2024). PMC 8281319. PMID 34277012.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  9. ^ Jeon, Y. H., Kraus, S. G., Jowsey, T., & Glasgow, N. J. (2010). The experience of living with chronic heart failure: a narrative review of qualitative studies. BMC health services research, 10(1), 77.
  10. ^ Jeon, Y. H., Jowsey, T., Yen, L., Glasgow, N. J., Essue, B., Kljakovic, M., ... & Kraus, S. G. (2010). Achieving a balanced life in the face of chronic illness. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 16(1), 66-74.
  11. ^ Benson T, Potts HWW (2014). A short generic patient experience measure: howRwe development and validation. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 499. doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0499-z
  12. ^ Haugum M, Danielsen K, Iversen HH, Bjertnaes O: The use of data from national and other large-scale user experience surveys in local quality work: a systematic review.International J Qual Health Care 2014:1;14. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzu077
  13. ^ Rozenblum R, Lisby M, Hockey P, Levtzion-Korach O, Salzberg C, Efrati N, Lipsitz S, Bates D: The patient satisfaction chasm: the gap between hospital management and frontline clinicians. BMJ Qual Saf 2013, 22:242-250
  14. ^ Holt, Jeana M (2018-08-12). "Patient Experience in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of CG-CAHPS Surveys". Journal of Patient Experience. 6 (2): 93–102. doi:10.1177/2374373518793143. ISSN 2374-3735. PMC 6558944. PMID 31218253.
  15. ^ Reeves, R; Seccombe, I (2008-12-01). "Do patient surveys work? The influence of a national survey programme on local quality-improvement initiatives". Quality and Safety in Health Care. 17 (6): 437–441. doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.022749. ISSN 1475-3898. PMC 2602592.
  16. ^ Lehoux, Pascale; Poland, Blake; Daudelin, Genevieve (October 2006). "Focus group research and "the patient's view"". Social Science & Medicine. 63 (8): 2091–2104. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.016. ISSN 0277-9536. PMID 16797811.
  17. ^ Larson, Reed; Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (2014), "The Experience Sampling Method", Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 21–34, doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_2, ISBN 978-94-017-9087-1, retrieved 2024-12-15
  18. ^ Yang, Michelle; Mady, Noor; Linnaranta, Outi (September 2021). "Utility of Psychophysiological Metrics in Guiding Treatment of Trauma Symptoms: A Systematic Review". Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy. 31 (3): 249–266. doi:10.1016/j.jbct.2021.01.004. ISSN 2589-9791.