Admirers described him as a pioneer of scientific anthropology. Chagnon was called the "most controversial anthropologist" in the United States in a New York Times Magazine profile preceding the publication of Chagnon's most recent book, a memoir titled Noble Savages: My Life Among Two Dangerous Tribes—the Yanomamö and the Anthropologists.[3]
Early life and education
Chagnon was born in Port Austin, Michigan, and was the second of twelve children.[3][4] After enrolling at the Michigan College of Mining and Technology in 1957, he transferred to the University of Michigan after his first year and there received a bachelor's degree in 1961, an M.A. in 1963, and a Ph.D. in 1966 under the tutelage of Leslie White.[5][4] Based on seventeen months of fieldwork begun in 1964, Chagnon's thesis examined the relationship between kinship and the social organization of Yanomamö villages.[6][4]
Career
Chagnon was best known for his long-term ethnographic field work among the Yanomamö, indigenous Amazonians who live in the border area between Venezuela and Brazil.[7] Working primarily in the headwaters of the upper Siapa and upper Mavaca Rivers in Venezuela, he conducted fieldwork from the mid-1960s until the latter half of the 1990s. According to Chagnon, when he arrived he realised that the theories he had been taught during his training had shortcomings, because contrary to what they predicted, raiding and fighting, often over women, was endemic. His habit of constantly asking them questions earned Chagnon the Yanomamö nickname "pesky bee." A major focus of his research was the collection of genealogies of the residents of the villages he visited, and from these he would analyze patterns of relatedness, marriage patterns, cooperation, and settlement pattern histories. The degree of kinship was seen by Chagnon as important for the forming of alliances in social interactions, including conflict.
Chagnon's methods of analysis are widely seen as having been influenced by sociobiology.[3][4] As Chagnon described it, Yanomamö society produced fierceness, because that behavior furthered male reproductive success. The genealogies showed that men who killed had more wives and children than men who did not kill.[3] At the level of the villages, the war-like populations expanded at the expense of their neighbors. Chagnon's positing of a link between reproductive success and violence cast doubt on the sociocultural perspective that cultures are constructed from human experience. An enduring controversy over Chagnon's work has been described as a microcosm of the conflict between biological and sociocultural anthropology.[3][8][9]
Chagnon's ethnography, Yanomamö: The Fierce People, was published in 1968 and ran to several editions, selling nearly a million copies.[3] It is commonly used as a text in university-level introductory anthropology classes, making it one of the bestselling anthropological texts of all time.[10][11][12] Chagnon was also a pioneer in the field of visual anthropology. He collaborated with ethnographic filmmaker Tim Asch and produced a series of more than twenty ethnographic films documenting Yanomamö life. The ethnographic film The Ax Fight, showing a fight among two Yanomami groups and analyzing it as it relates to kinship networks, is considered a classic in ethnographic film making.[13]
Most of the allegations made in Darkness in El Dorado were publicly rejected by the Provost's office of the University of Michigan in November 2000.[19] For example, the interviews upon which the book was based all came from members of the Salesians of Don Bosco, a congregation of the Catholic Church, which Chagnon had criticized and angered.[11]
The American Anthropological Association convened a task force in February 2001 to investigate some of the allegations made in Tierney's book. Their report, which was issued by the AAA in May 2002, held that Chagnon had both represented the Yanomamö in harmful ways and failed in some instances to obtain proper consent from both the government and the groups he studied. However, the Task Force stated that there was no support for the claim that Chagnon and Neel began a measles epidemic.[18] In June 2005, however, the AAA voted two-to-one to rescind the acceptance of the 2002 report.[20]
Alice Dreger, a historian of medicine and science, concluded after a year's research that Tierney's claims were false and the American Anthropological Association was complicit and irresponsible in helping spread these falsehoods and not protecting "scholars from baseless and sensationalistic charges".[21]
The controversy is covered in the 2005 book Yanomami: The Fierce Controversy and What We Can Learn from It by anthropologist Robert Borofsky.[22]
Anthropological critiques of his work
Chagnon's work with the Yanomamö was widely criticized by other anthropologists.[3][23][24] Anthropologists critiqued both aspects of his research methods as well as the theoretical approach, and the interpretations and conclusions he drew from his data. Most controversial was his claim that Yanomamö society is particularly violent, and his claim that this feature of their culture is grounded in biological differences that are the result of natural selection.[3]
The anthropologist Brian Ferguson argued that Yanomamö culture is not particularly violent, and that the violence that does exist is largely a result of socio-political reconfigurations of their society under the influence of colonization.[25][26] Bruce Albert rejected the statistical basis for his claims that more violent Yanomamö men have more children.[27][28] Others questioned the ethics inherent in painting an ethnic group as violent savages, pointing out that Chagnon's depiction of the Yanomamö as such breaks with anthropology's traditional ethics of trying to describe foreign societies sympathetically, and argued that his depictions resulted in increased hostility and racism against the Yanomamö by settlers and colonists in the area.[29][30][3] Emily Eakin countered that Albert "cannot demonstrate a direct connection between Chagnon's writings and the government's Indian policy" and that the idea that scientists should suppress unflattering information about their subjects is troubling and supports the idea that nonviolence is a prerequisite for protecting the Yanomamö.[3]
The anthropologist Marshall Sahlins, one of Chagnon's graduate teachers,[31] criticized Chagnon's methods, pointing out that Chagnon acknowledged engaging in behavior that was disagreeable to his informants by not participating in food-sharing obligations.[14][24] Sahlins claimed that Chagnon's trade of steel weaponry for blood samples and genealogical information amounted to "participant-instigation" which encouraged economic competition and violence.[24] Lastly, Sahlins argued that Chagnon's publications, which contend that violent Yanomamö men are conferred with reproductive advantages, made false assumptions in designating killers and omit other variables that explain reproductive success.[24] In 2013, Sahlins resigned from the National Academy of Sciences, in part in protest of Chagnon's election to the body.[14][32][33] Other researchers of the Yanomamö such as Brian Ferguson argued that Chagnon himself contributed to escalating violence among the Yanomamö by offering machetes, axes, and shotguns to selected groups to elicit their cooperation.[25][26][23][34][22][3] Chagnon said that it was instead local Salesian priests who were supplying guns to the Yanomamö, who then used them to kill each other.[3]
In his autobiography, Chagnon stated that most criticisms of his work were based on a postmodern and antiscientific ideology that arose within anthropology, in which careful study of isolated tribes was replaced in many cases by explicit political advocacy that denied less pleasant aspects of the Yanomamö culture, such as warfare, domestic violence, and infanticide. Chagnon stated that much of his work has undermined the idea of the 'Noble savage' – a romanticized stereotype of indigenous people living in synchrony with nature and uncorrupted by modern civilization.[35] Chagnon also stated that his beliefs about sociobiology and kin selection were misinterpreted and misunderstood, similarly because of a rejection of scientific and biological explanations for culture within anthropology.[35]
As a result of the controversy and the alleged unethical practices with the Yanomami,[36] Chagnon was officially barred from studying the Yanomami and from reentering their country in Venezuela.[37][38]
Written works
Books
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1968), Yanomamö: The Fierce People.
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1974), Studying the Yanomamö, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1992), Yanomamo – The Last Days of Eden.
Chagnon, Napoleon A.; Cronk, Lee; Irons, William (2002), Adaptation and Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective.
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (2013). Noble Savages: My Life Among Two Dangerous Tribes – The Yanomamö and the Anthropologists. New York: Simon and Schuster. ISBN978-0684855110.
Book chapters
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1986), "Yanomamö social organization and aggression", in Fried, M. (ed.), War; the Anthropology of Armed Conflict and Aggression, New York: Garden City
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1995), "Chronic Problems in Understanding Tribal Violence and Warfare", in Willey & Chichester (ed.), Genetics of Criminal and Antisocial Behavior, Ciba Foundation Symposium
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1972), "Tribal social organization and genetic microdifferentiation", in Harrison, A.; Boyce, A (eds.), Structure of human populations, Oxford
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1973), "Daily life among the Yanomamo", in Romney, A. K.; Devore, P. L. (eds.), You and others, Cambridge{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1973), "Yanomamo social organization and warfare", in Fried, M. (ed.), Explorations in Anthropology, New York: Crowell
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1973), "The culture-ecology of shifting (pioneering) cultivation among the Yanomamo Indians", in Gross, D. R. (ed.), International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, New York: Garden City
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1977), "Yanomamo – the fierce people", in Gould, R. (ed.), Man's many ways, New York: Harper & Row
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1977), "Yanomamo warfare", in Coppenhaver, D. (ed.), Anthropology full circle, New York: Prager
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1979), "Is Reproductive Success Equal in Egalitarian Societies?", in Chagnon, N.; Irons, W. (eds.), Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, North Scituate: Duxbury
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1979), "Mate Competition, Favoring Close kin, and Village Fissioning Among the Yanomamö Indians", in Chagnon, N.; Irons, W. (eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behavior, North Scituate: Duxbury
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1982), "Anthropology and the Nature of Things", in Wiegele, T. (ed.), Biology and the Social Sciences, Boulder: Westview
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1982), "Sociodemographic Attributes of Nepotism in Tribal Populations: Man the Rule-Breaker", in KSCS Group (ed.), Current problems in sociobiology, New York: Cambridge University Press
Chagnon, Napoleon A.; Ayers, M.; Neel, J. V.; Weitkamp, L.; Gershowitz, H. (1975), "The influence of cultural factors on the demography and pattern of gene flow from the Makiritare to the Yanomama indians", in Hulse, F. S. (ed.), Man and nature: studies in the evolution of the human species, New York: Random House
Chagnon, Napoleon A.; Bugos, P. E. (1979), "Kin selection and conflict: an analysis of a Yanomamö ax fight", in Chagnon, Napoleon A.; Irons, W. (eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behavior, North Scituate: Duxbury Press
Chagnon, Napoleon A.; Flinn, M. V.; Melancon, T. F. (1979), "Sex-ratio variation among the Yanomamö Indians", in Chagnon, Napoleon; Irons, W. (eds.), Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, North Scituate: Duxbury Press
Journal articles
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1967a), "Yanomamo – the fierce people", Natural History, vol. LXXVII, pp. 22–31
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1967b), "Yanomamö Social Organization and Warfare", Natural History, vol. LXXVI, pp. 44–48
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1968a), "The Culture-Ecology of Shifting (Pioneering) Cultivation Among The Yanomamö Indians", International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 249–255
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1968b), "The feast", Natural History, vol. LXXVII, pp. 34–41
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1970), "Ecological and Adaptive Aspects of California Shell Money", Annual Report of the UCLA Archaeological Survey, vol. 12, pp. 1–25
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1973), "The culture-ecology of shifting (pioneering) cultivation among the Yanomamo Indians", in Gross, D. R. (ed.), International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, New York: Garden City
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1975), "Genealogy, Solidarity and Relatedness: Limits to Local Group Size and Patterns of Fissioning in an Expanding Population", Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, vol. 19, pp. 95–110
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1976), "Yanomamo, the true people", National Geographic Magazine, vol. 150, pp. 210–223
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1980), "Highland New Guinea models in the South American lowlands", Working Papers on South American Indians, vol. 2, pp. 111–130
Chagnon, Napoleon A. (1981), "Doing fieldwork among the Yanomamo", Contemporary Anthropology, pp. 11–24
Chagnon, Napoleon A.; Le Quesne, P.; Cook, J. M. (1971), "Yanomamö Hallucinogens: Anthropological, Botanical, and Chemical Findings", Current Anthropology, vol. 12, pp. 72–74, doi:10.1086/201170, S2CID144661874
Chagnon, Napoleon A.; Margolies, L.; Gasparini, G.; Hames, R. B. (1982–83), "Parentesco, demografia, patrones de inversion de los padres y el uso social del espacio arquitectonico entre los Shamatari-Yanomamo del TF Amazonas: informe preliminar", Boletin Indigenista Venezolano (in Spanish), vol. 21, VZ, pp. 171–225
Film
Chagnon worked with ethnographic filmmaker Tim Asch to produce at least forty films on Yanomamo culture,[39] including The Feast (1969), Magical Death (1973) and The Ax Fight (1975). These films, especially The Ax Fight, are widely used in anthropological and visual culture curriculum and are considered to be among the most important ethnographic films ever produced.[40]
^Chagnon, Napoleon (19 August 2014). "Napoleon Chagnon: Blood is Their Argument". Edge (Interview). Interviewed by Steven Pinker; Richard Wrangham; Daniel C. Dennett; David Haig. Retrieved 23 February 2015.
^Borofsky, Robert; Albert, Bruce (31 January 2005). "Who are the controversy's main characters?"(PDF). Yanomami: The Fierce Controversy and What We Can Learn from It. Vol. 12. University of California Press. p. 11. ISBN978-0520244047. Archived(PDF) from the original on 12 March 2016. Retrieved 29 July 2019.
Ferguson, R. Brian (1995). Yanomami Warfare. Santa Fe, NM: SAR. ISBN978-0933452381.
Ferguson, R. B. (2001). "Materialist, cultural and biological theories on why Yanomami make war". Anthropological Theory. 1 (1): 99–116. doi:10.1177/14634990122228647. S2CID14061870.
Shavit, David (1992). The United States in Latin America: A Historical Dictionary. Greenwood. ISBN978-0313275951.
Silva, Stacey (20 January 1988). "Meeting The Fierce People"(PDF). The Daily Nexus. Archived(PDF) from the original on 31 October 2013. Retrieved 9 June 2016.