Marie Seong-Hak Kim (Korean: 김성학; born 1958) is a historian and jurist. She is known for her work of comparing European and East Asian legal history, with emphasis on the sources of law, legal theories, and court practices.[1]
Kim's Law and Custom in Korea: Comparative Legal History (2012) was the first study that comprehensively examined Korean legal history in comparison with European legal history, with particular focus on customary law.[5] A reviewer remarked that the book was far more than a presentation on Korean law and that it instead provided a “more general reflection on the development of customary law in the colonial context”.[6] It demonstrated, as observed by another reviewer, that “there is more than one way of approaching the role of law in the construction of empire (and of empire in the construction of law)”.[7] Her book revised the dominant view in historiography that premodern Korea had a system of private law in the form of customary law.[8] Kim credited Jérôme Bourgon's work in Chinese law for this insight.[9][10] She has argued that the concept of custom in the legal meaning of the term in East Asia was constructed by the Meiji legal elites in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries as they tried to facilitate the transplant of European civil law to Japan.[11] This imported notion of custom as law spread to China and Korea, serving as an intermediary regime between tradition and the demands of modern civil law.[12] Japanese law had profound influence throughout East Asia, in particular in Korea which was a Japanese colony (1910 – 1945).[13]
Kim's Constitutional Transition and the Travail of Judges: The Courts of South Korea (2019) was a study of the evolution of the judicial process and jurisprudence in modern South Korea, seen against the backdrop of the country's political and constitutional vicissitudes.[14][15] This work was also comparative in its core, contextualizing constitutional authoritarianism in the twentieth century, including Weimar Germany and Latin America.[16] Her investigation into and interpretation of judicial travails in the 1970s under the Yusin Constitution brought “the South Korean case into the general discussions of authoritarian legalism and of transitional justice taking place around the world”.[17]
A central conceptual framework in her research is the role of customary law in the formation of modern states.[24] "Kim relies on H. Patrick Glenn’s (1940–2014) evolutionary stages of custom in Europe: capture, reconstruction and marginalisation”[25] and has applied them to her analysis of East Asian law, showing “how a comparative legal historical approach can be executed in a fruitful manner and, moreover, how it can help to cross not only the confines of time and space but also the confines of legal cultures."[26] She has argued that the codification of customs was a recurring pattern in the process of receiving outside law, as witnessed across history from medieval France (receiving Roman law) to Meiji Japan (embracing European civil law) to colonial scenes (transplanting metropolitan law).[27][28] Her book, Custom, Law, and Monarchy: A Legal History of Early Modern France (2021), reinforced the foundation of her work in customary law.
Kim's political and jurisprudential approach to law has been contrasted to that of more culturally attuned historians.[7] Described as “primarily a lawyer's history”,[17] her writings focusing on politics and state legal institutions depart from the dominant trend, of late, of social and cultural history of law. Her scholarship has been noted as “a comparative law study that is unique for its kind to date.”[29]Alan Watson stated in 2012 that Kim's book, Law and Custom in Korea, “is the best law book I have read in several years.”[30]
Kim lives in Minneapolis, Minnesota. She is married and has two sons.[4] She is a member of the Minnesota Bar.[1]
Works
Monographs
Custom, Law, and Monarchy: A Legal History of Early Modern France (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, 304 pages). ISBN 9780192845498
Constitutional Transition and the Travail of Judges: The Courts of South Korea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, 388 pages). ISBN 9781108474894
Law and Custom in Korea: Comparative Legal History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 384 pages). ISBN 9781107006973
Michel de L'Hôpital: the Vision of a Reformist Chancellor during the French Religious Wars (Kirksville: Truman State University Press, Sixteenth Century Essays & Studies, vol. 36, 1997, 216 pages). ISBN 0940474387
Edited volume
The Spirit of Korean Law: Korean Legal History in Context (Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff, 2016, 279 pages). ISBN 9789004290778
^ abPrest, Wilfrid (2017). "Review of Law and Custom in Korea: Comparative Legal History". Law&history (Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Law and History Society). 4 (1): 176.
^See, Kim, Marie Seong-Hak (2009-01-01). "Customary Law and Colonial Jurisprudence in Korea". American Journal of Comparative Law. 57 (1): 205–248. doi:10.5131/ajcl.2008.0006.Kim, Marie Seong-Hak (2008). "比較史的側面からみた梅謙次郎の法思想と朝鮮における民法典構想の意義" [Ume Kenjiro's Legal Thought and Legislative Vision: Some Comparative Reflections]. 東洋文化硏究 Tōyō Bunka Kenkyū (in Japanese). 10: 99–136. And, Kim, Marie Seong-Hak (2009). "日本統治下における韓國の慣習法の構成" [The Construction of Korean Customary Law under Japanese Rule]. 東洋文化硏究 Tōyō Bunka Kenkyū (in Japanese). 11: 179–193.
^Prest, Wilfrid (2017). "Review of Law and Custom in Korea: Comparative Legal History". Law&history (Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Law and History Society). 4: 174.
^"Das Ergebnis ist eine rechtsvergleichende Studie, die in ihrer Art bislang einzigartig ist." Förster, Christian (2015). "Review of Marie Seong-Hak Kim, Law and Custom in Korea: Comparative Legal History,". Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht (in German). 20 (40): 299. "I recommend the book not only to those interested in Korea but also to Japanese lawyers so that they can deal with, instead of the reception of German legal transplants, the historically based, but unchanged, ongoing effects of Japanese law on their closest neighbors".