The Mancos Shale was first described by Cross and Purington in 1899[1] and was named for exposures near the town of Mancos, Colorado.
Geology
The unit is dominated by mudrock that accumulated in offshore and marine environments of the Cretaceous North American Inland Sea. The Mancos was deposited during the Cenomanian (locally Albian) through Campanianages, approximately from 95 million years ago (Ma) to 80 Ma.
The lower marine Mancos Shale conformably intertongues with terrestrial sandstones and mudstones of the Dakota and in its upper part grades into and intertongues with the Mesaverde Group. The shale tongues typically have sharp basal contacts and gradational upper contacts. Whereas in the plains east of the Rocky Mountains certain mappable marine shales are identified as formations (e.g., Skull Creek, Graneros), correlated deposits within the distribution of the Mancos are named as tongues of the greater Mancos Formation.
Thus, the classification broadly corresponds with the Colorado Group classification of the Great Plains region. As such, various units of the Colorado Group are recognized within the Mancos in those areas where their distinct facies can be recognized.[3]
The Mancos is a diverse unit, with dozens of named subunits in different structural basins that often intertongue with other formations.[4] The subunits and intertonguing formations (in italics) in each basin, in stratigraphic order, are:
Tununk Member of the Mancos Shale below the capping Ferron Sandstone Member. West side of the San Rafael Swell, Emery County, Utah.
The Mancos Shale was first named by Charles Whitman Cross and C.W. Purington in 1899, for outcrops near the town of Mancos, Colorado and along the Mancos River nearby. The two geologists also traced the unit into the Telluride, Colorado area.[1] W.T. Lee had traced the unit north into the Grand Mesa area, defining it as all marine shale between the Dakota and the Mesaverde.[19] It was subsequently traced into Utah[20] and New Mexico.[21]
During their work in New Mexico in 1924, J.B. Reeside, Jr., and F.H. Knowlton found that the Mancos Shale could be divided into biostratigraphic layers corresponding closely to formations of the Colorado Group further east. By 1944, Rankin had concluded that most of the formations of the Colorado Group could be identified as lithostratigraphic members of the Mancos Shale as well.[3] The unit was raised to group rank by C.E. Jamison in 1911,[22] and is sometimes given group rank in New Mexico[23] and Utah[24] as well.
^ abcRankin, Charles H. (1944). "Stratigraphy of the Colorado Group, Upper Cretaceous, in Northern New Mexico"(PDF). New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Bulletins (20). New Mexico School of Mines: 5. Retrieved 2018-08-13. ...that all divisions of the Colorado group (Mancos shale) as described in southern Colorado, except the Fort Hays limestone and the Apishapa shale, can be recognized in northern New Mexico.
^Lee, Willis Thomson (1912). "Coal fields of Grand Mesa and the West Elk Mountains, Colorado". United States Geological Survey Bulletin. 510. doi:10.3133/b510. hdl:2346/65145.