Chinese Communist Party term for historical viewpoints wholly critical of it
Historical nihilism (Chinese: 历史虚无主义; pinyin: Lìshǐ xūwú zhǔyì) is a term used by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and some scholars in China to describe research, discussions, or viewpoints deemed to contradict an official state version of history in a manner perceived to question or challenge the legitimacy of the CCP. The CCP opposes historical interpretations that are critical of it, the People's Liberation Army, socialism, and related topics.[1][2] Viewpoints that the state judges to be historical nihilism are subject to censorship and legal prosecution.[1]
In a January 2013 speech, CCP general secretaryXi Jinping described "hostile forces" as using historical nihilism to weaken the party's rule by smearing its history.[3][4][5]: 89 In early 2021, Xi increased efforts to promote a "correct outlook on history" ahead of the 100th Anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party, including opening a telephone hotline and website for citizens to report people who engage in acts of historical nihilism.[6][7][8]
Background
Historical nihilism has been defined in CCP publications as criticism of the entirety of an entity, such as the CCP, its national heroes, leaders, socialism and its official history, by citing only certain events about the entity without consideration of the whole.[9][10] Although 'incorrect' interpretations of history would have been censored and punished during the period of Mao Zedong (1949–1976) and Deng Xiaoping (1978–1989), neither leader made a clear attempt to engage against 'historical nihilism' as it is specifically understood today. According to Chinese historian Zhang Lifan, the main push to fight against 'historical nihilism', according to its specific modern meaning, undertaken by the CCP has its origin following the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre and coinciding events within the Eastern Bloc. In December of that year, Jiang Zemin made a speech in which he said that bourgeois liberalization had led to the spread of 'national nihilism' and 'historical nihilism', which had entered party thinking and brought about confusion.[11]
Rejecting the revolution; claiming that the revolution led by the Chinese Communist Party resulted only in destruction; denying the historical inevitability in China's choice of the Socialist road, calling it the wrong path, and the Party's and new China's history a "continuous series of mistakes"; rejecting the accepted conclusions on historical events and figures, disparaging our Revolutionary precursors, and vilifying the Party's leaders. Recently, some people took advantage of Comrade Mao Zedong's 120th birthday in order to deny the scientific and guiding value of Mao Zedong thought. Some people try to cleave apart the period that preceded Reform and Opening from the period that followed, or even to set these two periods in opposition to one another. By rejecting CCP history and the history of New China, historical nihilism seeks to fundamentally undermine the CCP's historical purpose, which is tantamount to denying the legitimacy of the CCP's long-term political dominance.
In 2013, Xi introduced the idea of the "Two Undeniables", which he described as "we must not use the period of history after reform and opening to deny the period of history prior to reform and opening" and we "must not use the period of history before reform and opening to deny the period of history after reform and opening".[13]
Government uses of the term
Media and education in China is not allowed to represent history in a manner that is forbidden by government censors. In 2018, the Law on the Protection of Heroes and Martyrs criminalized speech deemed slander of "heroes and martyrs".[1][7] The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences established a specialized unit to propagate an official version of history.[1]
Topics on things like the Great Chinese Famine, the Cultural Revolution and 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre are often scrubbed or at least depicted in such a way as to avoid blame on the party.[11][14] In May 2021, the Cyberspace Administration of China confirmed it had deleted over 2 million posts for historical nihilism.[15][16] In 2023, a previously official history textbook about the Mongols in China was banned for historical nihilism.[17] Chinese students in public schools, for example, may be taught that the Great Famine was caused by bad weather conditions without mention of human factors related to contemporary government policy at the time.[citation needed] One of the textbooks in use for grade 10 history, in the part of the book dealing with the period, contains only a single sentence devoted to the famine that simply claims there were 'great economic difficulties for the people between 1959 and 1961'.[18] Modern Chinese history is generally presented to praise the achievements of the CCP and its role in creating a prosperous 'new China'.[11]
When Xi Jinping became CCP general secretary and paramount leader in January 2013, he made a speech in which he said, 'The history of the post-reform period cannot be used to contradict the history of the pre-reform period, and the history of the pre-reform period cannot be used to contradict the history of the post-reform period'.[11] Although China's reforms since the 1980s caused it to radically change and abandon many of the Marxist policies that had existed under Mao Zedong, the official state-sanctioned version of history under Xi Jinping teaches an interpretation of continuity, praising both the contributions made by the CCP of Mao's generation and the CCP of the post-reform period. This is in contrast to interpretations in the period prior to Xi Jinping whereby some of Mao's policies could receive heavy criticism and the official stance of the party was a rejection of the Cultural Revolution, which had been referred to as the 'Ten Year Calamity' (十年浩劫).[19]
Collapse of the Soviet Union
In a 2013 speech, Xi Jinping described historical nihilism as contributing to the collapse of the Soviet Union:[20][21]: 24
Why did the Soviet Union disintegrate? Why did the Communist Party of the Soviet Union fall to pieces? An important reason is that in the ideological domain, competition is fierce! To completely repudiate the historical experience of the Soviet Union, to repudiate the history of the CPSU, to repudiate Lenin, to repudiate Stalin was to wreck chaos in Soviet ideology and engage in historical nihilism. It caused Party organizations at all levels to have barely any function whatsoever. It robbed the Party of its leadership of the military. In the end the CPSU—as great a Party as it was—scattered like a flock of frightened beasts! The Soviet Union—as great a country as it was—shattered into a dozen pieces. This is a lesson from the past!
— Xi Jinping, Uphold and Develop Socialism with Chinese Characteristics
Ji Zhengju described the lesson that the CCP draws from historical nihilism in the Soviet Union as "weakening and abandonment of Party guidance in the ideological field serves the schemes of western powers to divide, westernize, and vilify the system, and leads to the proliferation of all kinds of erroneous thought tides."[23] CCP leadership expresses concerns about historical nihilism in the context of the Soviet Union's experience with the refrain, "[t]he Soviets won the October Revolution with only a few hundred thousand members; it defeated the Nazis with a few million; but when it had tens of millions of members, it suffered a tragic collapse."[21]: 24
Academic analysis
Academics Jian Xu, Qian Gong, and Wen Yin write that the CCP's attention to historical nihilism "has gained momentum in the 21st century due to the rise of market-oriented cultural production in post-socialist China as well as the development of new media technologies."[24] They cite the TV drama adaptation of "Red Classics" as "a pertinent example of historical nihilism caused by market orientation in cultural production," explaining:[24]
To produce 'selling points' and increase audience ratings, some of the original works have been greatly revised for more dramatic tension, especially the stories and images of some high-profile revolutionary heroes and CCP leaders. To curb the trend, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television (SARAFT) issued a notice in 2004, stipulating that all Red Classics TV dramas had to be submitted to the Censorship Committee of SARAFT for final approval after passing the initial censorship at the provincial level.
Other uses of the term
According to Suisheng Zhao, some mainland Chinese scholars contend that Western scholars who describe the Qing dynasty as expansionist of engaging in historical nihilism.[25] In the view of these scholars, some Westerner scholar attempt to emphasize aggressive aspects of the Qing in order to demonstrate that modern China is inevitably aggressive.[25]
^Hou, Xiaojia (2024). "China's Shift to Personalistic Rule: Xi Jinping's Centralization of Political Power". In Fang, Qiang; Li, Xiaobing (eds.). China under Xi Jinping: A New Assessment. Leiden University Press. ISBN9789087284411. JSTORjj.15136086.
^ abcd"中共建党百年："虚无主义"阴影下剪不断、理还乱的中共历史" [The 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China: the history of the Communist Party]. BBC News. June 28, 2021. Archived from the original on July 1, 2021. Retrieved June 30, 2021.
^"【中共決議】繼續否定文革、大躍進 不提胡耀邦、趙紫陽" [[CCP Resolution] Continue to deny the Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward without mentioning Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang]. Radio Free Asia (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). Archived from the original on 2021-12-12. Retrieved 2022-10-09.
^"毛泽东、斯大林、希特勒等独裁者"不再风光"的最后一程" [The Last Journey of Mao Zedong, Stalin, Hitler and Other Dictators "No Longer Scenery"] (in Chinese). BBC News. September 9, 2021. Archived from the original on September 10, 2021. Retrieved September 10, 2021.