A Comparative Discourse of the Bodies Natural and Politique (1606), contributing to the traditional monarchist theory of the king's two bodies: the body politic and the body natural.[4] This is considered one important source for later divine right and royalist ideas, as well as spinning out the bodily metaphor (the King as the heart).
A Defence of the Right of Kings. Wherein the power of the papacie over princes, is refuted; and the Oath of Allegeance justified (1624), a belated reply to writings of Robert Parsons, belonged to the allegiance oath controversy.[5]
^Wormuth, Francis D. (1949). The Origins of Modern Constitutionalism. Harper & Bros. Without a sovereign, said Edward Forsett, "no people can ever as subjects range themselves into the order, and community of human society, howsoever, as men, or rather as wild savages, they may perhaps breathe a while upon the earth."