Eastern Air Lines Flight 66
Eastern Air Lines Flight 66 was a regularly scheduled flight from New Orleans to New York City that crashed on June 24, 1975, while on approach to New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport, killing 113 of the 124 people on board.[1]: 1 The crash was determined to be caused by wind shear caused by a microburst, but the failure of the airport and the flight crew to recognize the severe weather hazard was also a contributing factor.[1]: 1 Flight informationEastern Air Lines Flight 66 was a regularly scheduled passenger flight from New Orleans International Airport to John F. Kennedy International Airport in Jamaica, Queens, New York. On Tuesday June 24, 1975, Flight 66 was operated using a Boeing 727 trijet, registration number N8845E.[1]: 1 The flight departed from New Orleans at 13:19 EDT[b] with 124 people on board, including 116 passengers and eight crew members.[1]: 1–2 The flight operated from New Orleans to the New York City area without any reported difficulty.[1]: 2 The flight crew consisted of the following:
AccidentA severe thunderstorm arrived at JFK just as Flight 66 was approaching the New York City area.[1]: 2 [2] At 15:35, the crew was instructed to contact the JFK approach controller for instructions, and the approach controller sequenced it into the approach pattern for Runway 22L.[1]: 2 At 15:52, the approach controller warned all incoming aircraft that the airport was experiencing "very light rain showers and haze" and zero visibility and that all approaching aircraft must land using instrument flight rules.[1]: 2 At 15:53, Flight 66 was switched to another frequency for final approach to Runway 22L.[1]: 2 Controllers sent the crew radar vectors to operate around the approaching thunderstorms and sequence into the landing pattern with other traffic.[1]: 2 Because of the deteriorating weather, one of the crew members checked the weather at LaGuardia Airport in Flushing, Queens, the flight's alternate airport.[1]: 2 At 15:59, the controller warned all aircraft of "a severe wind shift" on final approach and advised that more information would be reported shortly.[1]: 2 Although communications on the frequency continued to report deteriorating weather, Flight 66 continued on its approach to Runway 22L.[1]: 3 At 16:02, the crew was told to contact the JFK tower controller for landing clearance.[1]: 3 At 16:05, on final approach to Runway 22L, the aircraft entered a microburst or wind shear environment caused by the severe storms. The aircraft continued its descent until it struck the approach lights approximately 2,400 feet (730 m) from the threshold of the runway.[2] After the initial impact, the plane banked to the left and continued to strike the approach lights until it burst into flames and scattered the wreckage along Rockaway Boulevard, which runs along the northeast perimeter of the airport.[c] Of the 124 people on board, 107 passengers and six crew members (including all four cockpit crew members) were killed. The other 11 people on board, including nine passengers and two flight attendants, were injured but survived.[a] The crash was the deadliest single-aircraft accident in United States history to date, and would remain so until the 1979 crash of American Airlines Flight 191. The victims included American Basketball Association player Wendell Ladner, a member of the 1974 champion New York Nets,[4] and Iveson B. Noland, bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana.[2] Investigation and resultsThe accident was investigated by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which revealed that minutes before Flight 66's crash, a Flying Tiger Line Douglas DC-8 cargo jet landing on Runway 22L reported tremendous wind shear on the ground. The pilot warned the tower of the wind-shear conditions, but other aircraft continued to land. After the DC-8 landed, an Eastern Air Lines Lockheed L-1011 landing on the same runway nearly crashed. Two more aircraft landed before Flight 66 attempted its landing. According to the conversation recorded by the cockpit voice recorder, the captain of Flight 66 was aware of reports of severe wind shear on the final-approach path (which he confirmed by radio to the final-vector controller), but decided to continue nonetheless.[1]: 3 The NTSB published its final report on March 12, 1976, determining the following probable cause of the accident:[5]
The NTSB also concluded that failure of either air traffic controllers or the flight crew to abort the landing, given the severe weather conditions, also contributed to the crash:
LegacyThe accident led to the development of the original low-level wind-shear alert system by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration in 1976, which was installed at 110 FAA-staffed airports between 1977 and 1987.[6] The accident also led to the discovery of downbursts, a weather phenomenon that creates vertical wind shear and poses dangers to landing aircraft, and it sparked decades of research into downburst and microburst phenomena and their effects on aircraft. The concept of downbursts was not yet understood when Flight 66 crashed. During the investigation, meteorologist Ted Fujita worked with the NTSB and the Eastern Air Lines flight-safety department to study the weather phenomena encountered by Flight 66. Fujita identified "cells of intense downdrafts" during the storm that caused aircraft flying through them "considerable difficulties in landing."[7]: 1 Fujita named this phenomenon "downburst cells" and determined that a plane can be "seriously affected" by "a downburst of air current."[7]: 1 Fujita proposed new methods of detecting and identifying downbursts, including installation of additional weather monitoring equipment at the approach ends of active runways, and also proposed development of new procedures for immediately communicating downburst detection to incoming aircraft.[7]: 46 Fujita's downburst theory was not immediately accepted by the aviation meteorology community. However, the crashes of Pan Am Flight 759 in 1982 and Delta Air Lines Flight 191 in 1985 prompted the aviation community to reevaluate and ultimately accept Fujita's theory and to begin researching downburst/microburst detection-and-avoidance systems in earnest.[8] See also
Footnotes
References
|