This article focuses only on one specialized aspect of the subject. Please help improve this article by adding general information and discuss at the talk page.(October 2014)
Dynamic combinatorial chemistry (DCC); also known as constitutional dynamic chemistry (CDC) is a method to the generation of new molecules formed by reversible reaction of simple building blocks under thermodynamic control.[3][4] The library[further explanation needed] of these reversibly interconverting building blocks is called a dynamic combinatorial library (DCL).[5][6] All constituents in a DCL are in equilibrium, and their distribution is determined by their thermodynamic stability within the DCL. The interconversion of these building blocks may involve covalent or non-covalent interactions. When a DCL is exposed to an external influence (such as proteins or nucleic acids), the equilibrium shifts and those components that interact with the external influence are stabilised and amplified, allowing more of the active compound to be formed.
History
By modern definition, dynamic combinatorial chemistry is generally considered to be a method of facilitating the generation of new chemical species by the reversible linkage of simple building blocks, under thermodynamic control.[4] This principle is known to select the most thermodynamically stable product from an equilibrating mixture of a number of components, a concept commonly utilised in synthetic chemistry to direct the control of reaction selectivity.[7] Although this approach was arguably utilised in the work of Fischer[8] and Werner[9] as early as the 19th century, their respective studies of carbohydrate and coordination chemistry were restricted to rudimentary speculation, requiring the rationale of modern thermodynamics.[10][11] It was not until supramolecular chemistry revealed early concepts of molecular recognition, complementarity and self-organisation that chemists could begin to employ strategies for the rational design and synthesis of macromolecular targets.[12] The concept of template synthesis was further developed and rationalised through the pioneering work of Busch in the 1960s, which clearly defined the role of a metal ion template in stabilising the desired ‘thermodynamic’ product, allowing for its isolation from the complex equilibrating mixture.[13][14] Although the work of Busch helped to establish the template method as a powerful synthetic route to stable macrocyclic structures, this approach remained exclusively within the domain of inorganic chemistry until the early 1990s, when Sanders et al. first proposed the concept of dynamic combinatorial chemistry.[4] Their work combined thermodynamic templation in tandem with combinatorial chemistry, to generate an ensemble complex porphyrin and imine macrocycles using a modest selection of simple building blocks.
Sanders then developed this early manifestation of dynamic combinatorial chemistry as a strategy for organic synthesis; the first example being the thermodynamically-controlled macrolactonisation of oligocholates to assemble cyclic steroid-derived macrocycles capable of interconversion via component exchange.[15] Early work by Sanders et al. employed transesterification to generate dynamic combinatorial libraries. In retrospect, it was unfortunate that esters were selected for mediating component exchange, as transesterification processes are inherently slow and require vigorous anhydrous conditions.[4] However, their subsequent investigations identified that both the disulfide and hydrazone covalent bonds exhibit effective component exchange processes and so present a reliable means of generating dynamic combinatorial libraries capable of thermodynamic templation. This chemistry now forms the basis of much research in the developing field of dynamic covalent chemistry, and has in recent years emerged as a powerful tool for the discovery of molecular receptors.
The development of protein-directed DCC has not been straightforward because the reversible reactions employed must occur in aqueous solution at biological pH and temperature, and the components of the DCL must be compatible with proteins.[16][22]
Several reversible reactions have been proposed and/or applied in protein-directed DCC. These included boronate ester formation,[23][24][25] diselenides-disulfides exchange,[26] disulphide formation,[27][28][29] hemithiolacetal formation,[30][31] hydrazone formation,[32][33] imine formation[34][35][36] and thiol-enone exchange.[37]
Although most applications of protein-directed DCC to date involved the use of single protein in the DCL, it is possible to identify protein ligands by using multiple proteins simultaneously, as long as a suitable analytical technique is available to detect the protein species that interact with the DCL components.[47] This approach may be used to identify specific inhibitors or broad-spectrum enzyme inhibitors.
Other applications
DCC is useful in identifying molecules with unusual binding properties, and provides synthetic routes to complex molecules that aren't easily accessible by other means. These include smart materials, foldamers, self-assembling molecules with interlocking architectures and new soft materials.[4] The application of DCC to detect volatilebioactive compounds, i.e. the amplification and sensing of scent, was proposed in a concept paper.[48] Recently, DCC was also used to study the abiotic origins of life.[49]
^Lehn, Jean-Marie (2011). "Constitutional dynamic chemistry: Bridge from supramolecular chemistry to adaptive chemistry". In Barboiu, Mihail (ed.). Constitutional Dynamic Chemistry. Topics in Current Chemistry. Vol. 322. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 1–32. doi:10.1007/128_2011_256. ISBN978-3-642-28343-7. PMID22169958.
^Schaufelberger, F.; Timmer, B. J. J.; Ramström, O. Principles of Dynamic Covalent Chemistry. In Dynamic Covalent Chemistry: Principles, Reactions, and Applications; Zhang, W.; Jin, Y., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 2018; Chapter 1, pp 1–30.
^ abcdeCorbett, P. T.; Leclaire, J.; Vial, L.; West, K. R.; Wietor, J.-L.; Sanders, J. K. M.; Otto, S. (Sep 2006). "Dynamic combinatorial chemistry". Chem. Rev. 106 (9): 3652–3711. doi:10.1021/cr020452p. PMID16967917.
^Komáromy, D.; Nowak, P.; Otto, S. Dynamic Combinatorial Libraries. In Dynamic Covalent Chemistry: Principles, Reactions, and Applications; Zhang, W.; Jin, Y., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 2018; Chapter 2, pp 31–119.
^Lehn, J.-M.; Ramström, O. Generation and screening of a dynamic combinatorial library. PCT. Int. Appl. WO 20010164605, 2001.
^Constable, Edwin C.; Housecroft, Catherine E. (2013-01-28). "Coordination chemistry: the scientific legacy of Alfred Werner". Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (4): 1429–1439. doi:10.1039/c2cs35428d. PMID23223794.
^Anderson, Sally; Anderson, Harry L.; Sanders, Jeremy K. M. (1993-09-01). "Expanding roles for templates in synthesis". Accounts of Chemical Research. 26 (9): 469–475. doi:10.1021/ar00033a003. ISSN0001-4842.
^Hoss, Ralf; Vögtle, Fritz (1994-03-03). "Template Syntheses". Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 33 (4): 375–384. doi:10.1002/anie.199403751. ISSN1521-3773.
^Lehn, Jean-Marie (2007-01-30). "From supramolecular chemistry towards constitutional dynamic chemistry and adaptive chemistry". Chem. Soc. Rev. 36 (2): 151–160. doi:10.1039/b616752g. PMID17264919.
^Thompson, Major C.; Busch, Daryle H. (1964-01-01). "Reactions of Coordinated Ligands. VI. Metal Ion Control in the Synthesis of Planar Nickel(II) Complexes of α-Diketo-bis-mercaptoimines". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 86 (2): 213–217. doi:10.1021/ja01056a021. ISSN0002-7863.
^Thompson, Major C.; Busch, Daryle H. (1962-05-01). "Reactions of Coördinated Ligands. II. Nickel(II) Complexes of Some Novel Tetradentate Ligands". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 84 (9): 1762–1763. doi:10.1021/ja00868a073. ISSN0002-7863.
^Brady, Paul A.; Bonar-Law, Richard P.; Rowan, Stuart J.; Suckling, Christopher J.; Sanders, Jeremy K. M. (January 1996). "?Living? macrolactonisation: thermodynamically-controlled cyclisation and interconversion of oligocholates". Chemical Communications (3): 319–320. doi:10.1039/cc9960000319.
^ abcGreaney, M. F.; Bhat, V. T. Protein-directed dynamic combinatorial chemistry. In Dynamic combinatorial chemistry: in drug discovery, bioinorganic chemistry, and materials sciences; Miller, B. L., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New Jersey, 2010; Chapter 2, pp 43–82.
^Herrmann, A. (Mar 2014). "Dynamic combinatorial/covalent chemistry: a tool to read, generate and modulate the bioactivity of compounds and compound mixtures". Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (6): 1899–1933. doi:10.1039/c3cs60336a. PMID24296754.
^ abcHochgürtel, M.; Lehn, J.-M. Dynamic combinatorial diversity in drug discovery. In Fragment-based approaches in drug discovery; Jahnke, W., Erlanson, D. A., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006; Chapter 16, pp 341–364.
^ abDemetriades, M.; Leung, I. K. H.; Chowdhury, R.; Chan, M. C.; Yeoh, K. K.; Tian, Y.-M.; Claridge, T. D. W.; Ratcliffe, P. J.; Woon, E. C. Y.; Schofield, C. J. (Jul 2012). "Dynamic combinatorial chemistry employing boronic acids/boronate esters leads to potent oxygenase inhibitors". Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (27): 6672–6675. doi:10.1002/anie.201202000. PMID22639232.
^ abLeung, I. K. H.; Brown Jr, T.; Schofield, C. J.; Claridge, T. D. W. (May 2011). "An approach to enzyme inhibition employing reversible boronate ester formation". Med. Chem. Commun. 2 (5): 390–395. doi:10.1039/C1MD00011J.
^Rasmussen, B.; Sørensen, A.; Gotfredsen, H.; Pittelkow, M. (Feb 2014). "Dynamic combinatorial chemistry with diselenides and disulfides in water". Chem. Commun. 50 (28): 3716–3718. doi:10.1039/C4CC00523F. PMID24577496. S2CID8774608.
^ abLiénard, B. M. R.; Selevsek, N.; Oldham, N. J.; Schofield, C. J. (Feb 2007). "Combined mass spectrometry and dynamic chemistry approach to identify metalloenzyme inhibitors". ChemMedChem. 2 (2): 175–179. doi:10.1002/cmdc.200600250. PMID17206734. S2CID36592352.
^ abLiénard, B. M. R.; Hüting, R.; Lassaux, P.; Galleni, M.; Frére, J.-M.; Schofield, C. J. (Feb 2008). "Dynamic combinatorial mass spectrometry leads to metallo-β-lactamase inhibitors". J. Med. Chem. 51 (3): 684–688. doi:10.1021/jm070866g. PMID18205296.
^ abCaraballo, R.; Dong, H.; Ribeiro, J. P.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Ramström, O. (Jan 2010). "Direct STD NMR identification of β-galactosidase inhibitors from a virtual dynamic hemithioacetal system". Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49 (3): 589–593. doi:10.1002/anie.200903920. PMID20013972.
^ abHochgürtel, M.; Niesinger, R.; Kroth, H.; Piecha, D.; Hofmann, M. W.; Krause, S.; Schaaf, O.; Nicolau, C.; Eliseev, A. V. (Jan 2003). "Ketones as building blocks for dynamic combinatorial libraries: highly active neuraminidase inhibitors generated via selective pressure of the biological target". J. Med. Chem. 46 (3): 356–358. doi:10.1021/jm025589m. PMID12540234.
^ abSindelar, M.; Lutz, T. A.; Petrera, M.; Wanner, K. T. (Feb 2013). "Focused pseudostatic hydrazone libraries screened by mass spectrometry binding assay: optimizing affinities toward γ-aminobutyric acid transporter 1". J. Med. Chem. 56 (3): 1323–1340. doi:10.1021/jm301800j. PMID23336362.
^Yang, Z.; Fang, Z.; He, W.; Wang, Z.; Gang, H.; Tian, Q.; Guo, K. (Apr 2016). "Identification of inhibitors for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor by using dynamic combinatorial chemistry". Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 26 (7): 1671–1674. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.02.063. PMID26920800.
^ abZameo, S.; Vauzeilles, B.; Beau, J.-M. (Dec 2006). "Direct composition analysis of a dynamic library of imines in an aqueous medium". Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006 (24): 5441–5444. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200600859.
^Herrmann, A. (Aug 2009). "Dynamic mixtures and combinatorial libraries: imines as probes for molecular evolution at the interface between chemistry and biology". Org. Biomol. Chem. 7 (16): 3195–3204. doi:10.1039/B908098H. PMID19641772.
^Shi, B.; Stevenson, R.; Campopiano, D. J.; Greaney, M. F. (Jul 2006). "Discovery of glutathione S-transferase inhibitors using dynamic combinatorial chemistry". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (26): 8459–8467. doi:10.1021/ja058049y. PMID16802811.
^Boul, P. J.; Reutenauer, P.; Lehn, J.-M. (Jan 2005). "Reversible Diels-Alder reactions for the generation of dynamic combinatorial libraries". Org. Lett. 7 (1): 15–18. doi:10.1021/ol048065k. PMID15624966.
^Poulsen, S.-A.; Bornaghi, L. F. (May 2006). "Fragment-based drug discovery of carbonic anhydrase II inhibitors by dynamic combinatorial chemistry utilizing alkene cross metathesis". Bioorg. Med. Chem. 14 (10): 3275–3284. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2005.12.054. hdl:10072/14469. PMID16431113.
^Sakai, S.; Shigemasa, Y.; Sasaki, T. (Nov 1997). "A self-adjusting carbohydrate ligand for GalNAc specific lectins". Tetrahedron Lett. 38 (47): 8145–8148. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(97)10187-3.
^Swann, P. G.; Casanova, R. A.; Desai, A.; Frauenhoff, M. M.; Urbancic, M.; Slomczynska, U.; Hopfinger, A. J.; Le Breton, G. C.; Venton, D. L. (1996). "Nonspecific protease-catalyzed hydrolysis/synthesis of a mixture of peptides: product diversity and ligand amplification by a molecular trap". Biopolymers. 40 (6): 617–625. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0282(1996)40:6<617::aid-bip3>3.0.co;2-z. PMID9140201. S2CID24603197.
^Lins, R. J.; Flitsch, S. L.; Turner, N. J.; Irving, E.; Brown, S. A. (Jan 2004). "Generation of a dynamic combinatorial library using sialic acid aldolase and in situ screening against wheat germ agglutinin". Tetrahedron. 60 (3): 771–780. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2003.11.062.
^Valade, A.; Urban, D.; Beau, J.-M. (Jan–Feb 2007). "Two galatosyltransferases' selection of different binders from the same uridine-based dynamic combinatorial library". J. Comb. Chem. 9 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1021/cc060033w. PMID17206823.
^Herrmann, A. (Jul 2012). "Dynamic Mixtures: Challenges and Opportunities for the Amplification and Sensing of Scents". Chem. Eur. J. 18 (28): 8568–8577. doi:10.1002/chem.201200668. PMID22588709.