The following catalog of works by the Florentine sculptor Donatello (born around 1386 in Florence; died on December 13, 1466, in Florence) is based on the monographs by H. W. Janson (1957), Ronald Lightbown (1980), and John Pope-Hennessy (1996), as well as the catalogs of the 2022/2023 exhibitions in Florence, Berlin and London.[1] In the case of unsigned or documented works, the attributions and dates are, as is usual, based predominantly on stylistic criteria and analogies to secured works. Many of the works attributed to Donatello were created in collaboration with other artists and with specialists in specific techniques.
About the table
The table is designed to be sorted in the best logical way possible, so that it can be used productively for searches, statistics and analysis (with many compromises; see below. The sorting function will also be available in the app sometime). Technical terms, places, etc., are only linked once at first appearance.
Subject/Name
First of all, it must be said that almost none of Donatello's works at the time had an individual name or title (just as only a few were signed; sometimes they have inscriptions that were added later, as with the Campanile figures). In addition to the Habakkuk, which was quickly nicknamed Zuccone because of the figure's pumpkin-shaped head, the late Judith and the Dovizia on the main market square (today's Piazza della Repubblica) in Florence, which were unique at the time, to clearly identify a work, the addition of the place (or commissioner) and (if it was known) the artist's name was needed. Donatello's two statues of David are similarly exceptional cases; both were generally known to be the work of Donatello, but for the second, the bronze David for the Medici, it was necessary to differentiate by adding the location, the client or the material. Almost all the other sculptures were figures of Christ, the Madonna and the saints, which were ubiquitous subjects and comprised the entire iconographicalcanon of what could be represented up to that point.
The bronze David, the Pazzi Madonna and the Cavalcanti Annunciation are all so-called Notnamen, short names that have been created over time by art historians since the 19th century, which have become established (with variants) and, particularly in the case of popular works, have become established in general through art literature and cultural and travel guides. A very special case in this regard is the so-called Amor-Attis, Amor-At(t)ys and vice versa, or also Atys-Amorino, as Janson described it in his monograph, which is still fundamental to this day; the figure remains a mystery with its ambiguous ancient attributes. Another persistent enigma is of course the bronze David.
Perhaps contrary to expectations, in the table these Notnamen under "Subject/Name" follow (in italics) after a general descriptive name of the object (e.g. "Lion..., (Marzocco)"), so that all prophet figures, for example, or the five John the Baptists can be brought together. Likewise, all Madonnas with the Christ Child are referred to as "Madonna and Child" so that they can be compared; the Pazzi Madonna, for example, can be found as "Madonna and Child (Pazzi Madonna)".
Donatello's documented collaborators and assistants are then named in small boldface, followed by uncertain attributions, dates or functions in small, bold and italic, which is a reference to missing documentation. Separating the largely undisputed works attributed to Donatello from those secured by documents or omitting them entirely would not allow an overall view of his oeuvre, to approximate the assumed simultaneous work on different genres and their chronological progression.
Form
Under "Form" statues can be separated from works in relief, although simultaneously all, e.g., niche figures can also be brought together.
Materials
Donatello worked with a wide variety of materials, most often in innovative ways. In his time and also due to Donatello, in addition to marble, the complex and expensive bronze and cheap, easy-to-handle fired clay (terracotta) became the essential materials. The stone used is almost exclusively white marble, especially for the early statues of the Cathedral of Florence, the works in rilievo stiacciato (shallow relief), the tombs and the two pulpits from the 1430s. Techniques for bronze had almost been lost; their revival is associated above all with Lorenzo Ghiberti, in his doors for the Florence Baptistery and the statues for Orsanmichele,[a][b] for which Donatello then made his first bronze figure, the Saint Louis of Toulouse (1418–1422).
The main material used for the main object of a work is always mentioned first, then its treatment and secondary materials (as in the "Saint Louis of Toulouse with niche", first "bronze, fire-gilt", then silver, enamel and rock crystal for the decoration of the bishop's crosier, and finally the marble for the niche in which the figure originally stood, which was also created by Donatello).
Dimensions
In the 15th century there was a locally applicable ell (or arm length) which could range between around 50 and 75 cm. The size of a sculpture may have been specified as such in contracts or described in sources. In Donatello's case, the Florentine braccio (Italian "arm") of 58.3 cm was used for the most part.
If the measurements of a work are not given in the table as height × width × depth (in centimeters), at minimum the height of a figure or the diameter (d) of a tondo will be given, if that was all that could be found in the literature.
Dating
When it comes to dating the work, a compromise had to be made in that the initial dates are decisive here. This means that for documented objects it is often the date of the (first) written commission or the decision to do so. However, as is often the case (at this time) and not only for Donatello, the completion of a work or even the beginning lay sometimes years in the future. The specified time period does not therefore mean the actual time that Donatello spent on a work. Especially since, even at the other end (that is, after Donatello had completed a sculpture), a considerable amount of time could pass before it was (as is often the case) primed and colored and also gilded by painters. The installation on site did not have to happen immediately, so such information in documents does not necessarily indicate the time at which the sculpture was finished.
The priority of the starting date ignores the fact that during the period of often non-continuous work on a work, the understanding, the general knowledge of the classical model, with which Donatello continuously dealt, as well as the access to a specific task could change. This means that during the work process a stylistic change could take place that was not foreseeable at the beginning, or technical difficulties (or other circumstances) could arise that had to be solved and perhaps lead to a different result from what was originally planned.
Examples here include the early works, especially the marble David, the possible reworkings of which have been the subject of much speculation.[4] Is the composition of the Saint Louis of Toulouse in several parts, rather than cast in one piece, as Ghiberti had done, due to Donatello's deficiencies in the knowledge of bronze casting, or was this based on a practical consideration regarding fire gilding or perhaps the complexity of the folds? The question of its open back (original or removed for Santa Croce?) will continue to concern art historians.
Locations
The locations always start with the city, then the building in or on which the work was or is located. Under original location there is also information that names the client or clients or allows conclusions to be drawn about them. An (early) relocation of a work is also noted (e.g., with both David figures). Today's location indicates in part the inventory number of the object ("Inv. xy") if it is part of a museum collection, if possible with a link to the institution's online catalog where – as with the Berlin collection – good images can be found, a detailed description and documentation, as well as a bibliography.
About the second table
Important here are the controversial works, which have always been close to the discussion about Donatello's œuvre, but which have been rejected from the catalogs of works that can be considered secure. Particularly worth mentioning here are the portrait bust of Niccolò da Uzzano, the Saint Peter at Orsanmichele and the Hildburgh Madonna and its derivatives.
Furthermore, the nature of the second table means that it cannot be complete. As far as casts and variants of mostly smaller to minute works are concerned, there may be a huge number scattered throughout museums and private collections that have received undocumented attributions based solely on stylistic similarities or technical details. This also applies to works based on Donatello's designs since the supposed designs no longer exist. The heraldic shields in particular, often with Donatello's trademark, the spiritelli, are probably all workshop products at best. Due to the lack of sources, there is no section for original location here, but one for the attribution appears as second column.
All of the works listed in the second table may be considered examples, with an obvious emphasis on works from the Skulpturensammlung in the Bode Museum, Berlin, for historical and practical reasons. On the one hand, the early Italian Renaissance and Donatello in particular have been the focus of collecting activities and research since the end of the 19th century, especially of Wilhelm von Bode, which was then essentially continued to this day. This is reflected in today's online catalog, wherein most of the works are excellently documented.[5] This is also a reason for selecting the pieces from other museums, the Victoria and Albert Museum in London, which was similarly engaged as Berlin, the National Gallery of Art in Washington, the Detroit Institute of Arts, and of course the museums in Florence itself, Donatello's birthplace and the center of his professional life.[6]
Florence, Orsanmichele, east side, niche of the Parte Guelfa, moved c. 1440s–1450s to niche above portal of Santa Croce; since 1483 Verrocchio's Doubting Thomas has occupied the original niche
bronze (doors), painted stucco (tondi and lunettes), sandstone (macigno)
0215 c. 215d (tondi without molding) c. 215 × 180 (lunettes without frame) 235 × 109 (each door with ten reliefs of 36.5 × 33.5 l, 34.5 r, both 35 at bottom)
Florence, Casa Vecchia de' Medici, perhaps at first in the old Medici palace; after 1457 in the court of Palazzo Medici; 1495 in the court of Palazzo della Signoria
^The first bronze portal for the Baptistery was created by Andrea Pisano between 1330 and 1336, based on the model of the bronze doors by Bonanno Pisano from around 1180 at Pisa Cathedral, of which only the Porta San Ranieri has survived. For its implementation, bronze casters had to be appointed from Venice, one of the last places where the late Antique–Byzantine tradition dominated and the associated knowledge was still cultivated. In addition, Florence was in good economic shape at the beginning of the 14th century, but this was no longer the case for the next few decades due to plagues and wars.
[2]
^Ghiberti's two sets of doors were created from 1403 and 1424 and from 1425 to 1452, respectively. The Saint John the Baptist of 1412–1416 for the Arte di Calimala (wool merchants) was the first bronze statue of this size since antiquity. This was followed by the Saint Matthew (1419–1423) and Saint Stephen (1425–1428) for the (equally influential) guilds of money changers (Cambio) and linen weavers (Lana). [3]
References
^See References. The traveling exhibition was a rare and as of 2023 the most recent major monographic exhibition on Donatello's work.
^Antonio Paolucci (1997). Die Bronzetüren des Baptisteriums in Florenz. Munich: Hirmer. pp. 8ff. ISBN3-7774-7370 -7.
^Krautheimer, Richard; Krautheimer-Hess, Trude (1958). "VI–VIII". Lorenzo Ghiberti. Princeton Monographs in Art and Archeology. Vol. 31 (1st Pb . In 1982 the 2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 71ff.
^Janson, pp. 3–7. Pope-Hennessy (1993) changed his mind when he thought he could identify the 1408 statue with another in the cathedral museum. Pope-Hennessy 1996, p. 348.
^Their online presentation, for example the Uffizi, initially admired, is unfortunately no longer exemplary.
^See Caglioti 2022, pp. 118–119 with photographs of both objects.
^Commission from December 19, 1408, for three evangelist figures to Niccolò Lamberti, Nanni di Banco and Donatello (plus one awarded to one of the three, then Bernardo Ciuffagni in 1410), on July 17, 1410, the chapels in the cathedral, which serve as workshops, locked, for which Donatello was paid a key in 1415. He received three payments for the statue until a reminder on April 16, 1415, to complete the figure by the end of May. Two more payments were made on May 10 and June 3. The installed statue was approved on October 8, 1415, and valued at 160 florins, of which 60 florins were still outstanding. Janson, p. 12f.
^The commission by the Arte to Donatello dates from April 3, 1411. The statue, including gilding and other jewelry, should be finished and installed on November 1 of the following year. On April 24, two stonemasons were commissioned to work on the niche. On April 29, 1413, the sculpture was approved. Janson, p. 17.
^On the east side of the Campanile stand today copies (from left to right) the Beardless Prophet, the so-called Pathetic Prophet by Giuliano da Poggibonsi, Abraham and Isaac, and the Profeta pensieroso.
^According to Caglioti Donatello reworked the head, youthful and with thick hair, Nanni did the rest already outlined by Ciuffagni. Afterwards the figure was never called Joshua again. The Baptist holds a scroll in his hands, but doesn't wear his signature pelt. Caglioti, p. 41.
^On the west side of the Campanile today are standing copies of the following statues, from left to right: This Saint John, the Zuccone, the Jeremiah and the Obadia by Nanni di Bartolo.
^Payment for both busts on May 13, 1422, Janson, S. 43.
^In his catasto of 1427, Donatello lists 15 florins that he owes to Giovanni di Jacopo degli Strozza for the "repeated bronze casting of the figure of St. Rossore and other things". The bust is not mentioned in Michelozzo's contemporaneous 'tax return', which excludes his involvement, Janson 1957, p. 56f. Also Anita Moskowitz, Donatello's Reliquary Bust of Saint Rossore. In: The Art Bulletin, Vol. 63, No. 1 (March 1981), pp. 41–48. Online as pdf on JSTOR
^Anita Moskowitz, Donatello's Reliquary Bust of Saint Rossore. In: The Art Bulletin, Vol. 63, No. 1 (March 1981), p. 41–48. Online als pdf on JSTOR.
^The head of Saint Rossore was discovered as a relic in 1422 and brought by the Umiliati from Pisa to Florence. They gave Donatello the commission for the bust. Already in the middle of the 16th century they had to give Ognissanti away to the Franciscans, and moved to Santa Caterina degli Abbandonati. In 1570 the order was banned and its property confiscated and sold. Janson 1957, p. 56.
^On February 10, 1423, the Soprastanti alla Fabbrica of the cathedral in Orvieto awarded a commission for a figure of the Baptist in gilded copper to Donatello, who received the wax for it on April 29. No further documents. In 1461 a stucco figure was installed on the baptismal font, which, according to Janson, rules out the possibility that Donatello had supplied the figure (he was either too busy and gave up the job or the casting went wrong and was not tried again). Janson, p. 246f. A document from 1487 discovered in the mid-1980s in the palazzo of the Martelli, which the Strozzi later acquired, mentions a bronze figure of the Baptist by Donatello. At a 2015 exhibition in the Pushkin Museum, an analysis during the previous restoration revealed a "very high" copper content, a "peculiar" casting technique and tenoning (possibly similar to that of the Louis of Toulouse). Caglioti identifies him with the Baptist for Orvieto, which later came into the possession of the Martelli. The attribution to Donatello is "absolutely undeniable". V. Rastorguev in Rowley 2022, cat. 51, p. 234. Caglioti 2022, p. 43. Documents quoted from Lightbown 1980, p. 322.
^Filippo Napoletano (attr.), Piazza del Mercato Vecchio in Florence c. 1600–1630, still with the Dovizia by Donatello.
^executed by Domenico di Pietro da Pisa and Angelo di Lippo di Paolo, Caglioti 2022, p. 58 (Ill. 31, p. 55).
^Only the Spiritello at the top looking down may be supposedly by Donatello. Rowley in Caglioti 2022, p. 214; furthermore his text on the pulpit, pp. 210–13.
^The old sacristy was built according to plans by Brunelleschi from 1422 (as later was the entire church of San Lorenzo). Donatello's share of the decorative equipment is huge and represents his largest coherent work. Even the sarcophagus decoration of the central tomb for Giovanni di Bicci de' Medici and his wife Piccarda Bueri, as part of the overall concept, clearly by Brunelleschi and others, and executed by Brunelleschi's adoptive son Buggiano (actually Andrea de Lazzaro Cavalcanti), bears Donatello's signature and was at least also worked on by sculptors of his workshop. The decoration of the sacristy was worked from top to bottom, first the twisted fabric wound with a gold ribbon that decorates the supports of both domes, then the large tondi with the four Evangelists and the four scenes from the life of John the Evangelist, and the frieze of the architrave with spiritelli in small tondi (in alternating red and grey). Later came the lunette reliefs with Saints Stephen and Lawrence, as well as Cosmas and Damian above the antique door gables, and finally the bronze doors with their reliefs (although they could have been worked on earlier). According to Brunelleschi's biographer Antonio Manetti, the friends broke up over the door frames, which were not discussed with Brunelleschi. Donatello also begun the work on a washbasin (lavabo) for the left back room completed by Verrocchio. Caglioti 2022, pp. 68–72, 232–239.
^For a list of missing details and history of the various reconstruction designs with illustrations, see Janson 1957 II, p. 162ff and I, plates 257–318.
^In the online catalogue of the National Gallery this sculpture is consciously described as "Florentine, 15th Century". In the catalogue of the 2022/23 touring exhibition Aldo Galli identifies it as by Donatello and the earliest example of this sculptural type of Madonna and Child, which subsequently replaced corresponding panel paintings. In Caglioti, p. 120.
^Entry in the Wallace Collection's online catalogue. The collection contains another, very similar piece, but without the conch (Inv. S300); there is also a smaller plaquette (Inv. S301), which is believed to have originated in Padua and is dated around 1450.
^Donatello and Desiderio had occasionally worked together, especially for the Martelli. This escutcheon was probably commissioned by Roberto Martelli for their new palazzo. Beatrice Paolozzi Strozzi, in Desiderio 2007, p. 69
^Perhaps as pupil of Donatello, or "Desiderio and Geri da Settignano after a model by Donatello?" according to Giancarlo Gentilini, in Desiderio 2007, p. 29.
Bibliography
Horst W. Janson (1957). The Sculpture of Donatello (2 Vol.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.. Archive URL of the 1963 edition in one volume with fewer images.
John Pope-Hennessy (1996) [1958]. An Introduction to Italian Sculpture, Vol. 2: Italian Renaissance Sculpture (4., revised ed.). London: Phaidon.
Francesco Caglioti with Laura Cavazzini, Aldo Galli and Neville Rowley (2022). Donatello. The Renaissance. Venice: Marsilio Arte. ISBN979-12-5463-006-8.
Neville Rowley with Francesco Caglioti, Laura Cavazzini and Aldo Galli (2022). Donatello. Erfinder der Renaissance. Leipzig: E. A. Seemann. ISBN978-3-86502-482-4.
Further reading
Avery, Charles, Donatello. Catalogo completo delle opere, Firenze 1991.
Wilson, Carolyn C., Renaissance Small Bronze Sculpture and Associated Decorative Arts, 1983, National Gallery of Art (Washington), ISBN0894680676