Due to the labile position of Epachthosaurus in titanosaur phylogeny, Carballido and colleagues proposed a new definition for Colossosauria in 2022, as all taxa closer to Patagotitan than Saltasaurus. This solidified the position of Colossosauria as the opposite clade to Saltasauroidea within Eutitanosauria, and stabilized all three groups based on derived members instead of the more problematic basal taxa like Epachthosaurus and Mendozasaurus. While Rinconsauria and Lognkosauria were both suggested to be probable Colossosaur subgroups, the inconsistencies in titanosaur phylogenetics meant that no changes to either group were proposed, leaving Colossosauria as probably also including unclassified taxa on the stem to either more restrictive group.[2]
^ abCarballido, J.L.; Otero, A.; Mannion, P.D.; Salgado, L.; Moreno, A.P. (2022). "Titanosauria: A Critical Reappraisal of Its Systematics and the Relevance of the South American Record". In Otero, A.; Carballido, J.L.; Pol, D. (eds.). South American Sauropodomorph Dinosaurs. Record, Diversity and Evolution. Springer. pp. 269–298. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95959-3. ISBN978-3-030-95958-6. ISSN2197-9596.
^Gallina, P.A.; González Riga, B.J.; Ortiz David, L.D. (2022). "Time for Giants: Titanosaurs from the Berriasian–Santonian Age". In Otero, A.; Carballido, J.L.; Pol, D. (eds.). South American Sauropodomorph Dinosaurs. Record, Diversity and Evolution. Springer. pp. 299–340. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95959-3. ISBN978-3-030-95958-6. ISSN2197-9596.
^Santucci, R.M.; Filippi, L.S. (2022). "Last Titans: Titanosaurs From the Campanian–Maastrichtian Age". In Otero, A.; Carballido, J.L.; Pol, D. (eds.). South American Sauropodomorph Dinosaurs. Record, Diversity and Evolution. Springer. pp. 341–391. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95959-3. ISBN978-3-030-95958-6. ISSN2197-9596.