The Chorzów Factory case (French: Affaire relative à l'usine de Chorzów) was a case heard before the Permanent Court of International Justice in 1927.[1][2] It was an early authority in international law that established a number of precedents in International Law.
[3][4]
A State is held responsible for expropriation of alien property
Under International Law, a nation is responsible for acts of Government organs or officers.
It is a general principle of international law that reparation is to be made for violations of international law. Regarding this, the PCIJ held: "reparation must, as far as possible, wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act and reestablish the situation which would, in all probability, have existed if that act had not been committed".[7] The reparation should thereby consist of a restitution in kind, or if this is impossible, the payment of a sum that corresponds to the value as compensation.
^Rosenne, Shabtai (2006). The Law and Practice of the International Court, 1920–2005 (4th ed.). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. ISBN978-9-004-13958-9.
^Bedjaoui, Mohammed (2012). "An International Contentious Case on the Threshold of the Cold War". In Bannelier, Karine; Christakis, Theodore; Heathcote, Sarah. The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case. (London: Routledge, 2012). p15. ISBN978-0-415-60597-7.
^"The Seventh Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice", Manley O. Hudson, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 23, No. 1 (Jan., 1929), pp. 1-29, doi:10.2307/2190232, JSTOR2190232
^Factory at Chorzów (Claim for Indemnity, Merits) PCIJ Series A, no. 17, 13 September 1928, page 47.