Bacchus and Ariadne (poem)Bacchus and Ariadne is a poem by Leigh Hunt written and published in 1819. The result of three years of work, the poem tells the Greek myth of Hero and Leander, two lovers, and the story of their forlorn fate. Hunt began working on the poem during the summer of 1816, arousing the interest of the publisher John Taylor, and despite repeated delays to allow Hunt to deal with other commitments the poem was finished and published in a collection 1819. Hunt later claimed in a poem about Bacchus and Ariadne that he was seeking to humanise myths and make them more understandable to the common people. The collection was well received by contemporary critics and poets, including Thomas Carlyle, while more modern writers such as Edmund Blunden have criticised the flow of its narrative. BackgroundAfter the decline in circulation for his paper the Examiner following Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo, Hunt began to focus more on his poetry. During this time, he decided to write poems about the story of Bacchus and Ariadne along with the story of Hero and Leander. After starting on the poem about Hero and Leander during summer 1816, Hunt showed the lines to the publisher John Taylor who gave Hunt 20 guineas as a partial payment for a collection including the poem.[1] A notice by Taylor and Hessey was sent to Hunt on 22 February 1817 asking about Bacchus and Ariadne. Percy Bysshe Shelley responded for Hunt to gain more time for Hunt to complete the volume. In June, Hunt devoted his time to work on the second edition of The Story of the Remini while hoping to finish the collection during winter 1818. However, the projected date was pushed back by the end of 1818.[2] By July 1819, the poem, along with Hero and Leander, The Panther were finished and soon published.[3] PoemThe poem begins with Ariadne waking into a half-conscious state:[4] The moist and quiet morn was scarcely breaking. When Ariadne realises that Theseus is not there, she immediately panics:[5] But how? Not there? She starts with a small cry, She faints as she realises that Theseus has deserted her in a reversal of the opening:[6] The faithless bark, far off, leaning away. This leads into a discussion of various possibilities for Theseus's leaving, with an emphasis that he left in the name of patriotism:[7] Some say that Theseus took this selfish flight The poem continues with Ariadne's lament over her fate and she expresses the terror that she feels:[8] 'Oh, Theseus, Theseus!' then awhile she stopped, After Ariadne finds a crown that Theseus left before, the poem describes the arrival of Bacchus and his companions:[9] Suddenly from a wood his dancers rush. Bacchus shows Ariadne that his love is able to mend the pain of Theseus's betrayal:[10] Bacchus took in his arms his bridal lass. The poem concludes with a cheerful philosophy that is symbolised in the image of Ariadne's immortalised crown:[11] The grateful god took off from his love's hair ThemesIn a poem to the 1832 version of the poems, Hunt uses verse to claim that he seeks to humanise myth to make it more understandable to the common person.[11] While many of the other works written by Hunt during the time had political themes that expressed his feelings about the actions of the British government, Bacchus and Ariadne was toned down and contained a "sociability" that was mentioned in the preface of Hunt's Foliage.[12] When placed into a sequence following Hero and Leander, the Bacchus and Ariadne is a consolation to the themes of the first. Bacchus is able to save Ariadne, whereas no one was able to save Hero.[10] Hunt relied on the story from Ovid's Heroides to base his poem, but Hunt describes an result to the story that Ovid leaves untold. A major connection between Hunt's and Ovid's version is that they begin at sunrise. Ovid uses the sunrise to show that Ariadne is aware that she is alone in a stark manner whereas Hunt tones down the moment to show that Ariadne is in a half-conscious state. This continues further into the plot, as Ovid describes Ariadne's distress over Theseus's absence in graceful manner whereas Hunt imitates a panicked state. For the rest of the story involving Bacchus, Hunt's version is related to Titian's painting of Bacchus and Ariadne. This is especially true of Hunt's descriptions of Bacchus's arrival, which is very similar to Titian's painting.[13] Hunt also differs from his sources in that he reproaches Theseus for his actions in the name of patriotism and religion. Hunt also claims that Theseus's abandonment of Ariadne was merely ploy that is similar to how modern governments use the same excuse for their misdeeds.[14] Critical responseThe collection containing Bacchus and Ariadne was well received by contemporary critics with the London Magazine devoted a lengthy analysis to the works.[15] Thomas Carlyle, Hunt's contemporary, in the poem "Ode to a Friend", praised Hunt and emphasised Bacchus and Ariadne in the description.[16] In 1930, Edmund Blunden claimed that the poem was an "unequally written narrative".[17] Rodney Edgecombe, in 1994, claimed, "Hunt did well to choose Bacchus and Ariadne for his next poem, for the simple reason that the subject itself is comparatively static and makes few demands for that narrative upkeep, that exigency of plot by which Hunt sometimes appears to be embarrassed."[4] Notes
References
|