en User talk:JackReynoldsADogOwner

This is JackReynoldsADogOwner's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Talk Archives Lists

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol \| July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

Hello JackReynoldsADogOwner,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination: MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF: The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers: The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP message

Hi JackReynoldsADogOwner,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello JackReynoldsADogOwner,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"User:JRADO" listed at Redirects for discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect User:JRADO and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 7#User:JRADO until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:21, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello JackReynoldsADogOwner,

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sandra Soroka

Hello, JackReynoldsADogOwner,

When you tag a page for speedy deletion, CSD G4, please provide a link to the deletion discussion you state happened. I see you use Twinkle, which is great, and when you select G4 there is a field there for you to put the link to the AFD discussion. Doing this makes it more likely that an admin will act on your request as they don't have to go searching for an AFD discussion which might be on a different version of the person or company's name. Without providing a link to a deletion discussion, it's likely that the tagged page will sit around for a while in a CSD category. Any way, thank you for all of your contributions to the project! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:04, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about the "Prose" tag on the David Bentley Hart bibliography

Thank you for the tag suggesting that the David Bentley Hart bibliography might read better as prose. There is a main article for David Bentley Hart in prose from which I took this list so that I could further develop the main article after another editor suggested this. Most of the other bibliographies that I see for authors such as the George Orwell bibliography or the G. K. Chesterton bibliography are in list form. Can you share more ideas about how the David Bentley Hart bibliography might be converted into prose format or might it make the most sense to continue developing it as a list that is in support of the main article in prose? Jjhake (talk) 04:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky Peter's Journey - Recordings

Hi - can you please review my edit attempting to fix the issue you identified. I wasn't trying to 'advertise' archive.org, only to provide context for how a recording of Lucky Peter's Journey might exist and where it might exist. It's rather remarkable that someone in Britain recorded that broadcast and it's now on archive.org, especially since the performance run ceased before the planned run and there is no commercial recording available. I think having this archive.org recording acknowledged on the wikipedia article a good thing. Gstalnaker (talk) 01:16, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gstalnaker: I reviewed over the edit that you made on your article, and yes it's better. Good job. And I do understand that your intentions wasn't necessarily to be "advertising" it. Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 02:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you won't mind if I ask another question - Lucky Peter's Journey is my first "from scratch" WikiPedia article (I've edited/modified existing articles in the past but never created one). Is the article a good article? Asking to confirm that the process I used is sufficient for WikiPedia's standards should I think to do this again. Thanks again! Gstalnaker (talk) 17:37, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gstalnaker: The article is a well-written article! There was a couple of things that somewhat stood out to me. One was the references: there were three times where you used the same references. In order to condense those references into one, I'd suggest using <ref name" "></ref> code. Additionally, I noticed that in section Reception it would be considered as {{Dead link}}. So if I were you, I'd consider reviewing over that section and adding some links to other articles in Wikipedia that's relevant to your article. Now, I've never written an article that's about opera specifically, so I don't know if there's a certain expectation that's supposed to be met, but I would highly recommend you looking at other articles that categorized as English-language operas, Operas, and possibly 1969 operas so you can see what's supposed to be included or not. Those are just few of the things I would recommend. Also, I don't mind you asking questions. I love answering questions and I will do my best to answer them to the best of my knowledge. Let me know if there's anything else I can help you with! Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 18:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jack - I am quite enjoying myself with this "Lucky-Peter's Journey" article. Scratches my academically-trained itch as it were. I've a quandry though and need some "professional" advice. Turns out that the title of this opera is "Lucky-Peter's Journey" - note the hyphen. The quandry is that some of the sources do not use the hyphen in the name (even the Arts organization that commissioned the work did not use the hyphen!). Technically one should never modify source usage and should indicate the spelling/usage error with [sic]. Doing so, however, may produce ugly results throughout the article. What is WikiPedia's preference? 1. Leave the errors? 2. Correct the errors? 3. Use [sic]? Thanks. I'm working on a better synopsis and with it in place the article will be finished, likely by week's end. Thanks for your guidance thus far. Gstalnaker (talk) 16:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gstalnaker: As of right now, I wouldn't worry about it. It's more of a hassle to fix the title. My first instinct is to leave. We can also create a redirect page of the title Lucky Peter's Journey if it needs it. But for right now, you don't have to change anything with the title. But, if someone that's more experienced as me says other wise, follow their direction because they will know it better than I do. I've just returned from months long break, so I'm trying to re-adapt myself into the Wiki community. Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 00:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full disclosure ... I'm ABD on a PhD in Music Theory and my unfinished disseration was on "narrative in opera." Now, that was 25 years ago, but one does develop habits after long years in academia (thus the footnoting/referencing in Lucky Peter's Journey). I need to get up to speed on WikiPedia requirements. I'm hampered in this particular article because there is little one can link to available on the internet for either Williamson's opera, Tracey's libretto (Tracey himself has no Wikipedia article), or Strindberg's play (e.g., the play does not have a WikiPedia article in English - there is a very brief one in Swedish which I used Google Translate to review). I'll figure out how to use the <ref name'> syntax. I don't understand your reference to {{Deak link}} -- what would be so considered? Use of the same reference I'd previously used? Thanks for the suggestion about reviewing other articles. I already see formatting that I prefer (a table to the right for composer, work, librettist, etc.). Gstalnaker (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gstalnaker: when it comes to dead link, it's not about references. What I mean is linking a certain thing—could be a person or a magazine that on Wikipedia—to your article. I re-looked at your article and I can already see three things that can be linked: Jennifer Vyvyan & Opera Magazine & The Observer. It's those notable things that's supposed to be linked. Hope this helps! Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 03:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Got you -- things in the text for which there exist already WikiPedia articles! I can do that easily enough. In a rather remarkabe turn of event, a gentleman in London who provided me some information I used in the article has an acquaintance who may be the source of that BBC Radio 3 recording and may have yet more information about Malcom Williamson (he's an expert) and the opera. The Internet certainly makes for a small world. I'm writing an email to this person right now. Gstalnaker (talk) 17:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inggit Garnasih for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inggit Garnasih is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inggit Garnasih until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 23:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Purplelavendermidnights 17

Hello Mr. Jack Reynolds,

I read your bio in Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters, and I like it. I want to be adopted by you. I've made several edits so far, created two articles, and do basic things like adding links, citiations (sometimes), and grammar/spelling. I also support #BlackLivesMatter, and I'm a Swiftie and an Arianator. (yes, I read your userboxes). I hope you consider adopting me.

Purplelavendermidnights 17 (talk) 03:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Purplelavendermidnights 17: I gladly accept to be your adopter. I'm so glad to hear that you've made several edits so far. I'll take a look at them when I have a chance today. I'm so happy that you support Black Lives Matter and that you're a Swiftie and an Arianator! I can't wait to work with you. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to ask me on here! Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 10:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi JackReynoldsADogOwner. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:31, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Protected articles

I have a question on protected articles. If there is no edit option, then who or what is able to edit the page? Can only admins do it? I'm just curious.

thanks,

Purplelavendermidnights 17 (talk) 02:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Purplelavendermidnights 17: That's a great question. There are a total of seven categories of protection on an article:

No protection: This 1st level allows any user—registered or not—to edit the article.
Pending changes protection: This 2nd levels allows all users to edit, but edits by unregistered or new editors/newely registered^[1] are hidden from readers until their edit(s) are reviewed by a pending changes reviewer or by an admin.
Semi: This is next level of security that does not allow unregistered or newly registered editors to edit.
Extended confirm protection: Any editors that are unregistered or newly registered and confirmed or autoconfirmed users are not allowed to make edits.
Template protection: Only users who have the template editor right or is an admin or interface admin are allowed to edit these kinds of article
Full protection: Only Admins and interface admin are allowed to edit these kinds of article
Permanent protection: Only interface admin are allowed to edit these kinds of article.

Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 22:16, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Heartbreak Anthem

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Heartbreak Anthem you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 13:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Wishing JackReynoldsADogOwner a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! interstate five 00:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Heartbreak Anthem

The article Heartbreak Anthem you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Heartbreak Anthem and Talk:Heartbreak Anthem/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 18:49, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

question

Am I ever allowed to ask users for help on a draft article.

thank you!

Purplelavendermidnights 17 (talk) 01:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Purplelavendermidnights 17: Good question and you can ask other users to help on a draft article. Hope this helps Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 09:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Because I started an article (the one I linked in my original topic) in drafts and I was going to ask you (Or anyone) for help. Purplelavendermidnights 17 (talk) 19:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Purplelavendermidnights 17: I will absolutely help you the article. Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 09:22, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

Purplelavendermidnights 17 (talk) 10:26, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Heartbreak Anthem

The article Heartbreak Anthem you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Heartbreak Anthem for comments about the article, and Talk:Heartbreak Anthem/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 14:21, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Inggit Garnasih

Hello, JackReynoldsADogOwner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inggit Garnasih".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 06:14, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from ExclusiveEditor

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § ‎AI for WP guidelines/ policies. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 14:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]