User talk:Antony-22

Ga CoConspirator Chart

Thank for helpful visual of Trump coconspirators, and please ignore this note if you made editorial choices to leave this off, but

SCOTT HALL actually fits in a number of circles, Imthink all (?). You correctly list him in coffee county breach circle (Acts 134,144 to 149; Counts 32 to 37) bottom right, but he is involved in overt acts 127 and 128, pp 59-60 (but not charged with Kutti, et al in Cts 30-31, p.89) and with Jeffrey Clark in Act 110, pg 50, but not charged in his act. Hall is the only person touching all/nearly all bubbles, so might be the sole link to bring a the RICO charge (?).

Ignore if you only bubbled co-count-charged folks. Great visual. good teaching tool. ThanKs CiteFinder (talk) 02:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CiteFinder: I'm glad you found it useful! Yes, the diagram is only based on the criminal counts, and not on the overt acts that are part of the racketeering count. It turned out to be quite a project to understand how the 41 criminal counts related to each other and the defendants. Doing the same for the 161 overt acts would be even more work! Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 22:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Love you added colors! Really nice touch! CiteFinder (talk) 06:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

It was great to meet you at Wikiconference North America! Thank you for coming to my talk and sharing your thoughts/ideas/concerns about AI & the future of Wikipedia throughout the conference – stay in touch and keep the ideas coming, please! :)

Accedietalk to me 22:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Accedie: It was great talking to you too! I will follow up soon. Also, take a look at List of crossings of the Dnieper: I imported a lot of information from Ukrainian Wikipedia some time ago, but I used Google Translate and probably didn't get all the transliterations right. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 23:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Michigan prosecution of fake electors

On 25 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Michigan prosecution of fake electors, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some of the Michigan fake electors attempted to enter the State Capitol, but were turned away by the state police? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Michigan prosecution of fake electors. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Michigan prosecution of fake electors), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings

Merry Christmas, Antony-22!
Wishing you Season's Greetings and a Happy Winter Solstice! As the year comes to a close, I want to express my appreciation for your dedicated efforts on Wikipedia and extend heartfelt thanks for your assistance throughout the years. May the holiday season bring you and your loved ones abundant joy, good health, and prosperity.

RV (talk) 09:25, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of People in the line of succession to the British throne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article People in the line of succession to the British throne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People in the line of succession to the British throne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DrKay (talk) 10:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Early life and career of Kamala Harris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Early life and career of Kamala Harris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early life and career of Kamala Harris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bohbye (talk) 05:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kamala Harris's tenure as Attorney General of California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamala Harris's tenure as Attorney General of California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamala Harris's tenure as Attorney General of California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bohbye (talk) 05:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks for the ride back! Mathnerd314159 (talk) 01:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Boulder Bridge and Ross Drive Bridge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boulder Bridge and Ross Drive Bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boulder Bridge and Ross Drive Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hog Farm Talk 05:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of East Glebe & Potomac station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article East Glebe & Potomac station, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Glebe & Potomac station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (classified documents case)

Hi, I wanted to let you know there was a move discussion at Talk:Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (classified documents case) leading to the current title. While you weren't the first to move the page after the discussion, I would recommend checking the talk page before moving contentious topics, as titles that result from successful move discussions can only be overridden by another discussion. I'm sure you know this, but I just wanted to say something rather than sending a template. Thanks! ASUKITE 18:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]