Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.
If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia'sXFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
Stop changing list styles; you will just be reverted
Stop going back to articles where you've been reverted for changing a flatlist to an hlist and making more edits. You will be reverted again. If you don't stop, you will be reported for disruptive editing. Over the many times you have made these edits, I have linked you to WP:HLIST, which basically says the list styles are no different, so you do not need to change them. It is your personal preference, and it's needless. Ss11214:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
May 2018
Your recent editing history at Maluma (singer) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. INeedSupport (talk) 21:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ZI Jony was:
Nothing has changed after declining of submission by Primefac.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tommy Vext and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tommy Vext, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
Hello, 24.157.19.180!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 19:49, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! FigfiresSend me a message!18:44, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Keith Wallen has been reverted. Your edit here to Keith Wallen was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://facebook.com/keithwallenmusic) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
I feel the genres listed for Five Finger Death Punch need better sourcing. I restored your edits and I will search the web for better sourcing for their genre online.
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Angels Fall (song) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Angels Fall (song) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zFfRSeA1ls) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
February 2019
Please do not make edits concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, , as you did at Sub Focus discography, without updating the |access-date= parameter in the citation template, as you did at Sub Focus discography. The |access-date= parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to update the |access-date= parameter in the article. Do not update peaks without updating the date in the accompanying reference.Ss11218:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: This user is back, making the same sort of disruptive edits they did earlier this year. Changing list styles and other formatting without explaining why, and what appears to be personal preference. Making unexplained edits in general, and what looks to be addition of unsourced genres. Please see if it's worth blocking them again. Ss11219:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. But their long term editing pattern is concerning. This may be a shared IP based on their editing history. Maybe a library or school. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:51, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Lunay (singer)), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 14:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
November 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hold the Line has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
