Polygonia c-album

Polygonia c-album
Dorsal view
Ventral view of the hutchinsoni form showing light-coloured wing undersides
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Arthropoda
Class:	Insecta
Order:	Lepidoptera
Family:	Nymphalidae
Genus:	Polygonia
Species:	P. c-album
Binomial name
Polygonia c-album (Linnaeus, 1758)
Subspecies
Eight, see text
Synonyms[1]
List Grapta agnicula Moore, 1872 Nymphalis c-album (Linnaeus, 1758) Papilio c-album Linnaeus, 1758 Polygonia castanea Verity, 1950 Polygonia delta-album Joseph, 1919 Polygonia elongana Cabeau, 1926 Polygonia extincta Rebel, 1923 Polygonia i-album Maslowscy, 1923 Polygonia immaculata Dioszeghy, 1935 Polygonia imperfecta Blachier, 1908 Polygonia manchurica Matsumura, 1939 Polygonia nigracastanea Verity, 1950 Polygonia nigrolunaria Nitsche, 1912 Polygonia nubilata Lempke, 1956 Polygonia o-album Newnham, 1917 Polygonia obscura Hannemann, 1915 Polygonia p-album Bezsilla, 1943 Polygonia pallida Tutt, 1896 Polygonia pusilla Stichel, 1908 Polygonia uncipuncta Joseph, 1919 Polygonia variegata Tutt, 1896 Polygonia vilarrubiai Perez de-Gregorie & Masó Planas, 1976 Vanena hutchinsoni Robson, 1880 Vanessa c-album (Linnaeus, 1758) Vanessa cloqueti Clement, 1917 Vanessa comma-alba Miller, 1821 Vanessa f-album Esper, 1783 Vanessa g-album Fourcroy, 1785 Vanessa lutescens Harcourt-Bath, 1896 Vanessa melanosticta Stephens, 1856

Polygonia c-album, or the “comma”, is a food generalist (polyphagous) butterfly species belonging to the family Nymphalidae. The angular notches on the edges of the forewings are characteristic of the genus Polygonia, which is why species in the genus are commonly referred to as anglewing butterflies. Comma butterflies can be identified by their prominent orange and dark brown/black dorsal wings.

Both the larval and adult stages exhibit protective camouflage, mimicking bird droppings and fallen leaves respectively, which reduces predation. The pupae are also cryptic, resembling shriveled leaves. During the later stage of development, the larvae also develop strong spines along their backs. The species is commonly found in Europe, North Africa, and Asia, and contains several subspecies. Although the species is not migratory, the butterflies are strong fliers, resulting in an open population structure with high gene flow and increased genetic variation.

Description

The outer margins of the wings are strongly and irregularly dentate, excavated and angulated. The upper side of the wings has a bright orange color, decorated with brown marks and light spots on the edge. The reverse is marbled with brown. Folded, the butterfly looks like a dead leaf. The hindwings have on the reverse side a white spot usually in the shape of a comma.

The sexual dimorphism is slight and concerns the intensity of the coloration, the silhouette and the size, the male having a wingspan of 22 to 24 mm. and the female of 25 to 26 mm. The seasonal dimorphism is more marked: the first generation ( hutchinsoni form, named for Emma Hutchinson,[2] May-June) has the upperside fawn orange and the underside brown-gold and the hindwing bears distally a broad dark red-brown area in which is situated a row of light brown hastate spots. The underside is dark, being either unicolorous or prominently marmorated, while the second generation (form c-album (July, in autumn and spring after overwintering) has a more red upper and dark brown underside (ground-colour is less bright). In the summer form the wings are less dentate, and the hindwing has a narrow dark submarginal band, near which stands a row of light lunules proximally bordered by a band of brown arcs. The underside is of a paler color, being less distinctly — sometimes, however, very prominently — marmorated and shaded.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

The comma belongs to the family Nymphalidae, the largest family of butterflies with 13 subfamilies. Within the genus Polygonia, a sister-group relationship between P. c-album and P. faunus is strongly supported by larval development analysis and synapomorphies. In both species, the adults and larvae have similar polyphagous habits. The genus Polygonia is also closely related to the genera Kanisha and Roddia, each containing a single species: K. canace and R. l-album.[3]

Geographic range and habitat

The comma inhabits areas including Europe, North Africa, and Asia.[4] It is primarily a woodland butterfly, living in low-density forests with sunshine and moist soil. Specifically, the species is commonly found in the woodland, country lanes, and garden areas of Norway, Sweden, and Great Britain.[5][4] As a food generalist, or polyphagous species, comma butterflies can feed upon a variety of host plants, leading to widespread ranges across continents.[6] In response to climate change, they are also undergoing range expansion.[7]

Subspecies

Form hutchinsoni (named for Emma Hutchinson) Northamptonshire, UK

The following subspecies are found in the indicated parts of the comma's range:

• P. c. c-album Europe
• P. c. imperfecta (Blachier, 1908) North Africa
• P. c. extensa (Leech, 1892) western China, central China
• P. c. kultukensis (Kleinschmidt, 1929) Transbaikalia
• P. c. hamigera (Butler, 1877) Ussuri (type locality Edo, Japan)
• P. c. koreana (Bryk, 1946) Korea
• P. c. sachalinensis (Matsumura, 1915) Sakhalin
• P. c. asakurai (Nakahara, 1920) Taiwan
• P. c. agnicula (Moore, 1872) Nepal [8]

Food resources

Larval host plant preferences and selection

For comma butterflies, food resources consumed during development are the primary source of nitrogen and protein during adulthood. Because they feed exclusively on plants, making them a phytophagous species, the quality of plants upon which the larvae feed is strongly correlated with their future fitness.[9] The larval form is often divided into five developmental stages known as instars. Although during the first three instars larvae are observed to remain almost entirely upon the underside of leaves, the fourth and fifth instar larvae are more active in obtaining food resources.[10] The later instar larvae are specialized feeders and favor several host plants during the larval stage: Urtica dioica, Ulmus glabra, Salix caprea, R. uva-crispa, and Betula pubescens.[6][11] While pupal weight and overall larval survival rates are similar among larvae regardless of host plant, the larval development times differ significantly.[12] As a result, larvae prefer feeding on plants that allow them to develop in the shortest amount of time. Larvae reared on U. dioica demand the shortest development time and is thus favored over other plants. On the other hand, B. pubescens is at the bottom of the host plant preference hierarchy.[9] Favoring plants in the family Urticaceae is speculated to have originated from the species' ancestors, providing an explanation for larval preference for U. dioica.[12] Within the U. dioica plant, larvae are not shown to differentiate between high quality (fresher) and low quality (wilting) nettles, a pattern expected of a polyphagous species.[13]

• 
  Urtica dioica
• 
  Ulmus glabra
• 
  Salix caprea

Reproduction and life history

Mating

Mating system

Comma butterflies have a polyandrous mating system where females mate with multiple males to receive the necessary amount of sperm to fertilize their eggs.[14] The polyandrous female distributes her matings equally over her lifetime, so males' mating success increases proportionally to their lifespan. The mating success of both sexes is correlated to the duration of an individual's life, so no difference in mortality rates is observed between males and females.[15]

Female mate choice

Females exercise mate choice before, during, and after mating and can distinguish between males who were reared on high-quality versus low-quality host plants. The ability to recognize adults reared on higher quality host plants is selected for because males fed better plants during development provide superior nuptial gifts. In comma butterflies, nuptial gifts are edible spermatophores containing spermatozoa and nutrients. When comparing the two common host plants U. dioica and S. caprea, females preferentially choose to mate with males reared on U. dioica, because these males have higher protein content and increased spermatophore production.[14]

Females preferentially mate with males which provide larger investments, in the form of nuptial gifts. When females mated with males with higher-quality nuptial gifts, they not only allocate more resources to egg production but also use the resources to improve their own reproductive success. The investments can be used to increase female life expectancy, female maintenance, and future reproduction. During each mating, males allocate a constant amount of investment towards each nuptial gift, indicating that male mate choice does not play a role in allocation of resources.[14]

Oviposition

Females recognize and select a host plant carefully before laying their eggs upon it, generally favoring host plants where larval development time is minimized. Akin to the preferred host plants for larvae, females prefer plants in the order Urticales.[12] Despite the overall preference for plants leading to short larval development, host plant preference variation between females exists. Although the partiality for certain plant species appears to be inherited across populations, the pattern is not significant within a single population.[16] This pattern of deviation results from the open population structure with high gene flow.[17]

Parent-offspring conflict

In theory, females would prefer host plants where their offspring performance is maximized, and the larvae would benefit from being able to feed on the best resources nearby their hatch site. However, this is not always observed in nature due to external factors such as predators, parasites, and pathogens. Instead, there is a trade-off between female host plant preference and larval fitness in many species of butterfly. In P. c-album, instead of accepting the host plant that the female selected, first instar larvae leave their hatch site in search of alternative food sources.[9][13] Larvae that stay on the inferior host are not only smaller, but also have lower survival and growth rates.[9]

Egg mass

Unlike female host plant preference, egg mass is not shown to be sex-linked. Instead, egg mass is most likely controlled by additive autosomal genes, where the egg sizes of offspring are intermediate compared to its parents. The type of host plant chosen during the larval stage is not correlated with their offspring's egg mass, indicating that egg size is not related to fitness.[16]

Life history

Egg

Egg

Females lay their eggs on a variety of host plants, preferring those that minimize larval development time. Unlike some butterflies who lay their eggs in batches, comma females often lay their eggs singly.[18] After each egg is laid, the female scouts out other possible host plants before determining the site of her next egg.[6] The eggs are green when first laid, and gradually turn yellow and ultimately grey before hatching,[19] which generally takes four to five days.[20] Although the female can allocate more resources into egg production based on the nuptial gifts received by mates, the total number of eggs laid or the mass of the eggs are altered based on the host plant. A lack of correlation suggests that neither egg quantity nor egg mass indicate future fitness for the offspring.[14]

Larva

Larva

The larval period is separated into five distinct stages or instars. During the first three instars, the comma larvae have a cryptic appearance to avoid detection while they primarily stay on the underside of leaves.[7][10] Fourth and fifth instar larvae search for food more actively.[10] However, the beginning of the fourth instar also marks the development of black, white, and orange patterns. To avoid predation despite its conspicuous appearance, the larva develops strong spines along its body. The larvae have a continuous white marking along their backs to mimic bird droppings. In its final instar, the white colouration disappears but the spines persist.[7]

Three possibilities describing why spines may develop during later instars are as follows: smaller larvae cannot sustain the spines, larger larvae benefit more from spines as their predators shift from invertebrates to vertebrates, or because an effective spine pattern cannot be achieved upon the surface area of the smaller larvae.[7]

Aside from the formation of spines, no other defence against predators appears to be present. While fourth and fifth instar larvae are rarely preyed upon by the same predator, removal of the spines leads to repeated predation, indicating that no chemical defence mechanism exists to deter enemies.[7]

Pupa

Pupa

P. c-album adults undergo one of two morphs: the directly developing morph or the diapausing (delayed development) morph. For both males and females, directly developing adults have a shorter pupal time of around 10 days, whereas the diapausing adults spend over 11 days pupating. Additionally, the pupae whose adult stage would enter the directly developing morph had larger pupal weights, consistent with the notion that the lighter morph allocates more resources towards maturation and reproduction.[21]

Adult

Full-grown comma butterflies have a wingspan of about 45 mm or 1.8 inches. The name comma butterfly derives from the small white C-shaped marking resembling a comma on the underside of its wings.[5] Commas can exhibit both mimicking and polyphenism, a phenomenon where multiple morphs exist in a population.[6][22] Due to their orange and dark brown/black appearance, the butterflies resemble fallen leaves when their wings are closed. Adults can also undergo one of two morphs: the directly developing morph or the diapausing morph. During the directly developing morph, the butterflies mature sexually at a rapid rate. Females undergoing this morph oviposit in the summer, leading the phase to also be referred to as the summer morph. Butterflies portraying the summer morph have light coloured undersides.[6] The diapausing morph, also known as the spring or winter morph, occurs when the female enters a reproductive diapause, a time when sexual maturity is postponed, and hibernates before ovipositing in the spring instead.[4][12] During the diapausing morph, the undersides of the wings are much darker.[23]

• 
  Male
• 
  Male underside
• 
  Female
• 
  Female underside

Predators, parasites, and diseases

Predators

Because of their wide distribution around the world, comma butterflies have a variety of vertebrate and invertebrate predators, including blue tits,[24] chickens,[7] and other birds.

Parasites

The two main parasites that have been known to affect comma butterflies are Glypta erratica, a type of stem borer in Eupatorium, and Pteromalus vanessae.[25] P. vanessae often oviposit in the larvae of butterflies such as P. c-album and Nymphalis antiopa.[26]

Diseases

P. c-album are known to be infected by cytoplasmic virus diseases. The disease infection usually starts in the cytoplasm of the midgut and progresses throughout the foregut and hindgut as well.[27]

Antipredator adaptations

Larva

The first three larval instars are camouflaged, the dark colours making the larvae less vulnerable to detection. In the fourth instar, the appearance of the larval body is relatively more colourful with white, black, and orange aposematic patterns. A white stripe along its back mimics the pattern of bird droppings, further displaying protective colouration of the species.[7] During the transition between the third and fourth instars, the larvae also develop strong spines along their backs. Decreased predation by birds on P. c-album third-instar larvae has been shown compared to other larval stages, indicating that the spines increase defence. However, this appears to provide limited protection as some birds were able to consume the larvae despite the appearance of spikes.[7]

Adult

Adults also make use of camouflage. The underside of adult wings mimic the patterns of a fallen leaf. The similarity is further exaggerated by the irregular wing edges, not resembling a typical butterfly, that are characteristic of the genus Polygonia.[23] The butterflies can also undergo one of two morphs: directly developing (summer) or diapausing (spring/winter).[12] The diapausing morph is triggered when resources are allocated to survival, resulting in a less conspicuous, darker appearance of adults to avoid predation.[4]

Physiology

Diapause

Under cold winter conditions, adults can undergo diapause, a period of delayed sexual maturation to maximize survival. The diapause morph is based upon the length of the day that the larvae experienced during the development stage of the life cycle. The diapausing morph is more commonly observed in P. c-album butterflies inhabiting south Europe, North Africa, and Asia. The threshold for the photoperiod triggering diapause is primarily due to autosomal genes but may also be influenced by sex-linked genes and/or parental effects. Females tend to enter a diapause based on a photoperiod that is intermediate to the parents, and males are more likely to enter diapause than females. This indicates that males and females have evolved different optimal lifecycles. Females profit from larger body size, because it is correlated with fecundity whereas male fitness is not related to size.[4]

Thermoregulation

Although dark appearances such as the early instars and the diapause morph are commonly seen in species as a means of thermoregulation, the behaviour of commas makes the theory unlikely for this species.[18] During the first three instars, the cryptically coloured larvae spend most of their time under leaves, limiting their exposure to the sun. Although the later instar larvae are more dispersive in search of food resources, basking is very rarely observed.[10] Thus, their body temperatures do not elevate dramatically in the presence of sunshine, decreasing the effect that dark exteriors customarily have on biological processes such as metabolism and development rate. However, P. c-album larvae are observed basking during the two later instars. This may be explained by the resemblance that the later instar larvae have to bird droppings, which would limit predation despite increasing exposure to predators. Thermoregulatory behaviours may have a much more pronounced effect on later instar larvae but do not appear to affect the first three larval stages.[18]

Polyphenism

Comma adults are dimorphic. The two phases are the directly developing morph (summer morph) and the diapausing morph (winter/spring morph).[23] The two morphs are determined by autosomal genes, which determine which phase the adults will undergo based on the length of the day experienced during the larval stage. During winter, the length of the day is short, and butterfly survival rate is lower. To allow the adults to survive through the cold winter and oviposit during the spring, the adults go through the diapausing morph which feature darker wings for greater protective colouration during hibernation. When the photoperiods are longer during summertime, the adults go through the directly developing phase with a lighter appearance. The lighter appearance is attributed to fewer resources allocated to producing a protective appearance and more resources used to assist reproduction.[4]

Interactions with humans

Climate change

Climate change has dramatically affected the habitat ranges of the comma, encouraging range expansion and feeding upon a wider variety of host plants. In Britain, comma butterflies have shown the greatest shift in habitat and feeding resources, altering its preferred host plant from H. lupulus to U. glabra and U. dioica. The movement of the distribution appears to be following a change in climate. Although not a migrating butterfly species, the butterflies at the edges of the range show much higher dispersal tendencies than those living within the range.[28]

Population change

In the 19th century, the British population of the comma crashed,[5][29] possibly as a result of reduced hop (H. lupulus) farming. From about 1930 the population recovered, and the comma is now one of the more familiar butterflies in Southern England. It is also found in Scotland and in North Wales.[30] Since the 1970s in Britain, specialist butterflies have decreased in population as their preferred habitat and host plants area becomes smaller. On the other hand, generalist species such as P. c-album have started to expand their range. In particular, comma butterflies have expanded along the northern edge of their range.[31]

References

1. "Polygonia c-album". Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Retrieved 18 January 2022.
2. Michael A. Salmon; Peter Marren; Basil Harley (2000). The Aurelian Legacy: British Butterflies and Their Collectors. University of California Press. p. 160. ISBN 978-0-520-22963-1.
3. Nylin, Sören; Nyblom, Klas; Ronquist, Fredrik; Janz, Niklas; Belicek, Joseph; Källersjö, Mari (2001-08-01). "Phylogeny of Polygonia, Nymphalis and related butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): a total-evidence analysis". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 132 (4): 441–468. doi:10.1006/zjls.2000.0268.
4. Söderlind, Lina; Nylin, Sören (2011-03-01). "Genetics of diapause in the comma butterfly Polygonia c-album". Physiological Entomology. 36 (1): 8–13. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.2010.00756.x. S2CID 84549842.
5. UK Safari
6. Janz, Niklas; Nylin, Sören; Wedell, Nina (1994). "Host Plant Utilization in the Comma Butterfly: Sources of Variation and Evolutionary Implications". Oecologia. 99 (1/2): 132–140. Bibcode:1994Oecol..99..132J. doi:10.1007/bf00317093. JSTOR 4220740. PMID 28313958. S2CID 25442043.
7. Nylin, Sören; Gamberale-Stille, Gabriella; Tullberg, Birgitta S. "Ontogeny of Defense and Adaptive Coloration in Larvae of the Comma Butterfly, Polygonia C-album (Nymphalidae)". Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society. 55 (2): 69–73.
8. Citation error. Mouse-over '[verification needed]' for pop-up msg. ^[verification needed]
9. Gamberale-Stille, Gabriella; Söderlind, Lina; Janz, Niklas; Nylin, Sören (2014-08-01). "Host plant choice in the comma butterfly–larval choosiness may ameliorate effects of indiscriminate oviposition". Insect Science. 21 (4): 499–506. Bibcode:2014InsSc..21..499G. doi:10.1111/1744-7917.12059. PMID 24006353. S2CID 7968989.
10. Bryant, Simon R.; Thomas, Chris D.; Bale, Jeffrey S. (2000). "Thermal Ecology of Gregarious and Solitary Nettle-Feeding Nymphalid Butterfly Larvae". Oecologia. 122 (1): 1–10. Bibcode:2000Oecol.122....1B. doi:10.1007/pl00008825. JSTOR 4222508. PMID 28307946. S2CID 30057650.
11. de la Paz Celorio-Mancera, Maria; Wheat, Christopher W.; Vogel, Heiko; Söderlind, Lina; Janz, Niklas; Nylin, Sören (2013-10-01). "Mechanisms of macroevolution: polyphagous plasticity in butterfly larvae revealed by RNA-Seq". Molecular Ecology. 22 (19): 4884–4895. Bibcode:2013MolEc..22.4884D. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.720.6263. doi:10.1111/mec.12440. PMID 23952264. S2CID 22054763.
12. Nylin, Sören (1988). "Host Plant Specialization and Seasonality in a Polyphagous Butterfly, Polygonia C-Album (Nymphalidae)". Oikos. 53 (3): 381–386. Bibcode:1988Oikos..53..381N. doi:10.2307/3565539. JSTOR 3565539.
13. Janz, Niklas; Nylin, Sören (1997-05-22). "The role of female search behaviour in determining host plant range in plant feeding insects: a test of the information processing hypothesis". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 264 (1382): 701–707. Bibcode:1997RSPSB.264..701J. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0100. PMC 1688427.
14. Wedell, Nina (1996). "Mate Quality Affects Reproductive Effort in a Paternally Investing Species". The American Naturalist. 148 (6): 1075–1088. doi:10.1086/285972. JSTOR 2463563. S2CID 84887901.
15. Wiklund, Christer; Gotthard, Karl; Nylin, Sören (2003). "Mating System and the Evolution of Sex-Specific Mortality Rates in Two Nymphalid Butterflies". Proceedings: Biological Sciences. 270 (1526): 1823–1828. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2437. JSTOR 3592098. PMC 1691446. PMID 12964985.
16. Nygren, G. H.; Nylin, S.; Stefanescu, C. (2006-11-01). "Genetics of host plant use and life history in the comma butterfly across Europe: varying modes of inheritance as a potential reproductive barrier". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 19 (6): 1882–1893. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01174.x. PMID 17040385. S2CID 38037208.
17. Nylin, Sören; Nygren, Georg H.; Windig, Jack J.; Janz, Niklas; Bergström, Anders (2005-04-01). "Genetics of host-plant preference in the comma butterfly Polygonia c-album (Nymphalidae), and evolutionary implications". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 84 (4): 755–765. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00433.x.
18. Bryant, Simon R.; Thomas, Chris D.; Bale, Jeffrey S. (2002). "The influence of thermal ecology on the distribution of three nymphalid butterflies". Journal of Applied Ecology. 39 (1): 43–55. Bibcode:2002JApEc..39...43B. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00688.x. JSTOR 827218.
19. Citation error. Mouse-over '[verification needed]' for pop-up msg. ^[verification needed]
20. Scudder, Samuel Hubbard; Davis, William Morris; Woodworth, Charles William; Howard, Leland Ossian; Riley, Charles Valentine; Williston, Samuel Wendell (1889). The Butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada: With Special Reference to New England. The author. p. 343. ISBN 978-0-665-26321-7. glypta erratica.
21. NYLIN, SÖREN (1992-11-01). "Seasonal plasticity in life history traits: growth and development in Polygonia c-album (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 47 (3): 301–323. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.458.122. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1992.tb00672.x.
22. Stephen J. Simpson, Gregory A. Sword, Nathan Lo (21 February 2012). "Polyphenism in Insects". Current Biology. 22 (18): R738–R749. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.006. PMID 21959164. S2CID 656039.
23. Wiklund, Christer; Tullberg, Birgitta S. (2004). "Seasonal polyphenism and leaf mimicry in the comma butterfly". Animal Behaviour. 68 (3): 621–627. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.12.008. S2CID 54270418.
24. Olofsson, Martin; Dimitrova, Marina; Wiklund, Christer (December 2013). "The white 'comma' as a distractive mark on the wings of comma butterflies". Animal Behaviour. 86 (6): 1325–1331. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.10.003. ISSN 0003-3472.
25. Howard, Leland Ossian (1889). The Hymenopterous Parasites of North American Butterflies. Samuel H. Scudder.
26. Treatise on Injurious and Benefecial Insects to Crops. Concept Publishing Company.
27. Steinhaus, Edward (2012-12-02). Insect Pathology V1: An Advanced Treatise. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-323-14352-3.
28. Braschler, Brigitte; Hill, Jane K. (2007). "Role of Larval Host Plants in the Climate-Driven Range Expansion of the Butterfly Polygonia c-album". Journal of Animal Ecology. 76 (3): 415–423. Bibcode:2007JAnEc..76..415B. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01217.x. JSTOR 4539145. PMID 17439459.
29. Comma page at UK Butterflies
30. Comma page at Butterfly Conservation site
31. Pollard, E.; Moss, D.; Yates, T. J. (1995). "Population Trends of Common British Butterflies at Monitored Sites". Journal of Applied Ecology. 32 (1): 9–16. Bibcode:1995JApEc..32....9P. doi:10.2307/2404411. JSTOR 2404411.

Further reading

• Tolman, Tom; Lewington, Richard (2009). Collins Butterfly Guide: The Most Complete Field Guide to the Butterflies of Britain and Europe. Harper Collins. ISBN 978-0-00-727977-7.

External links

• Polygonia c-album at Fauna Europaea